Iraqis could still kick out U.S. troops
The new troop agreement between Iraq and the United States contains a provision that could prove problematic: One concession obtained by the Sunnis in return for their eventual support was a post-facto referendum to test public support for the pact, to be held by the end of July next year. Rejection would trigger a mechanism ...
The new troop agreement between Iraq and the United States contains a provision that could prove problematic:
The new troop agreement between Iraq and the United States contains a provision that could prove problematic:
One concession obtained by the Sunnis in return for their eventual support was a post-facto referendum to test public support for the pact, to be held by the end of July next year. Rejection would trigger a mechanism by which Iraq could withdraw from the deal in a year.
You can bet that a number of Iraqi groups, such as the supporters of Moqtada al-Sadr, will try to whip up public sentiment against the pact, ratcheting up tensions. Still, it’s not like the United States would have to leave immediately if the referendum succeeds — we’re talking about the difference between 2010 and 2011 here.
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.