The tyranny of lawyers
My latest National Interest Online essay offers some further thoughts on why lawyers and not public policy grads are getting the good foreign policy jobs (one reason not offered in the essay — “lawyers” is more elegant to write than “public policy grads”). It expands on the signaling argument I made here. My partly-tongue-in-cheek suggestion ...
My latest National Interest Online essay offers some further thoughts on why lawyers and not public policy grads are getting the good foreign policy jobs (one reason not offered in the essay -- "lawyers" is more elegant to write than "public policy grads"). It expands on the signaling argument I made here. My partly-tongue-in-cheek suggestion for how to correct this situation comes at the end: So there are logical reasons why lawyers might be getting the top foreign-policy posts. Are these substantively good reasons, however? As a professor with an interest in seeing his graduates thrive in the public sector, I think attending a public-policy school should send an even stronger signal. It should say that the person in question is well-trained and has the other traits necessary for a leadership position. Perhaps the next step should be to make the first year of a public-policy degree more like the first year of law school. After all, why should one-Ls have all the fun? [Cue Satanic cackle here!!--ed.]
My latest National Interest Online essay offers some further thoughts on why lawyers and not public policy grads are getting the good foreign policy jobs (one reason not offered in the essay — “lawyers” is more elegant to write than “public policy grads”). It expands on the signaling argument I made here. My partly-tongue-in-cheek suggestion for how to correct this situation comes at the end:
So there are logical reasons why lawyers might be getting the top foreign-policy posts. Are these substantively good reasons, however? As a professor with an interest in seeing his graduates thrive in the public sector, I think attending a public-policy school should send an even stronger signal. It should say that the person in question is well-trained and has the other traits necessary for a leadership position. Perhaps the next step should be to make the first year of a public-policy degree more like the first year of law school. After all, why should one-Ls have all the fun?
[Cue Satanic cackle here!!–ed.]
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.