The CIA is on the tracks, and the train is coming
By Dov Zakheim Leon Panetta may know very little about intelligence, but he knows a lot about managing difficult organizations. After all, he was Chief of Staff in a White House that was not noted for its organizational rigor. As Director of the Office of Management and Budget, he had to say "no" more often ...
By Dov Zakheim
By Dov Zakheim
Leon Panetta may know very little about intelligence, but he knows a lot about managing difficult organizations. After all, he was Chief of Staff in a White House that was not noted for its organizational rigor. As Director of the Office of Management and Budget, he had to say "no" more often than he said "yes." He will have to do more of the same in a CIA that is one and the same time demoralized, yet the subject of bitter criticism for behaviors than seem to stretch the boundaries of legality.
The CIA is a tough organization. It has done in many would-be reformers, both on the Right and the Left. No doubt there will be some among the Agency’s veterans who will view Panetta as another outsider around whom they can run circles, while newer, younger Agency types, with only the past few years as their guide, may resent what they might see as "do-gooder" meddling with their organization.
But life has changed for the CIA. The one major legacy it will inherit from the Bush years is that it no longer has the same direct line to the President it once did. Rather, its Director is subordinate to the Director of National Intelligence, pushing the organization into the background. In addition, the CIA will be carefully watched by a Democratic Congress that has been itching to tighten oversight screws but was prevented from doing so by a Republican Administration. The Obama team is unlikely to provide the CIA with the same political cover.
So those tough veterans, and those spirited newbies are in for a shock. They may try to run circles around the new CIA boss, but they will then hit the brick wall of Congress. Ironically, Panetta might be a reformer, but with his years in the Congress as well as the White House, he may actually be a better and more successful Agency leader than one who might have come from its own ranks — someone, say, like Porter Goss.
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
