The real turf battle might not be between Hillary and Barack
Sitting in yesterday’s New York Times Talks panel, “Obama’s First 100 Days”, with Jeff Zeleny, Peter Baker and Sheryl Gay Stolberg, I was struck by something the panelists said and then quickly veered away from. Someone — and, given the darkened theatre, my notes are sketchy on this point — mentioned that the real administration ...
Sitting in yesterday’s New York Times Talks panel, “Obama’s First 100 Days”, with Jeff Zeleny, Peter Baker and Sheryl Gay Stolberg, I was struck by something the panelists said and then quickly veered away from. Someone — and, given the darkened theatre, my notes are sketchy on this point — mentioned that the real administration fight over foreign policy dominance is unlikely to be between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. It’s actually likely to be between Hillary Clinton and former Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair and Vice President-Elect Joe Biden.
On one hand, the Times people point out, Biden has been quite critical — as have many other people — of the role current Vice President Dick “Svengali” Cheney has played in this administration and in some of its more controversial foreign and defense policy positions. On the other hand, in the November 2007 Democratic debates, he wiped the floor with both Clinton and Obama on foreign policy issues, chastising them both for failing to come out strongly enough against martial law in Pakistan or in favor of cutting funding for Gitmo.
And while Biden is “ready on day one” to chair Obama’s White House Task Force on Working Families, he spent his last few days as senator roaming around Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq, and he wasn’t just seeing the sights.
Had things worked out a little differently, Biden — instead of Sen. John Kerry — would be chairing Hillary’s confirmation hearing tomorrow, though he is still allowed a vote, an opening statement, and a question period if he’s in attendance (which his staff could not confirm at this time). One assumes that, publicly at least, he’s bound to be one of Clinton’s biggest cheerleaders for the time being. But will the man the Times reporters dubbed “The Man Who Can’t Shut Up” really be content shelving his years of foreign policy experience to chair a wishy-washy White House Task Force when there are negotiations to be had, foreign leaders to meet, and foreign policy advice to be offered? One has to wonder.
Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
The Scrambled Spectrum of U.S. Foreign-Policy Thinking
Presidents, officials, and candidates tend to fall into six camps that don’t follow party lines.
What Does Victory Look Like in Ukraine?
Ukrainians differ on what would keep their nation safe from Russia.
The Biden Administration Is Dangerously Downplaying the Global Terrorism Threat
Today, there are more terror groups in existence, in more countries around the world, and with more territory under their control than ever before.
Blue Hawk Down
Sen. Bob Menendez’s indictment will shape the future of Congress’s foreign policy.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.