Shadow Government

A front-row seat to the Republicans' debate over foreign policy, including their critique of the Biden administration.

Is “smart power” stupid?

By Christian Brose I’m coming a day late to this, and but I can’t pass up a few words on this from Hillary Clinton’s opening statement: We must use what has been called “smart power,” the full range of tools at our disposal — diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal, and cultural — picking the right ...

By Christian Brose

By Christian Brose

I’m coming a day late to this, and but I can’t pass up a few words on this from Hillary Clinton’s opening statement:

We must use what has been called “smart power,” the full range of tools at our disposal — diplomatic, economic, military, political, legal, and cultural — picking the right tool, or combination of tools, for each situation. With smart power, diplomacy will be the vanguard of foreign policy.

Now, America needs many things right now, but another contribution to the foreign policy lexicon is not one of them. The whole hard power/soft power thing always seemed too much like a Cialis commercial to me. And smart power isn’t much of an improvement. True, as Laura helpfully reminds us, "smart power" is not Hillary Clinton’s creation. It was born on the pages of that other foreign policy magazine. And there it should have stayed.

Yes, every secretary of state needs to put her own unique rhetorical brand on the foreign policy she will be practicing. I get that. Heck, I’ve even been complicit in it (and not just once). But smart power? Come on. The thing that bothers me about it is that it’s a description of means, process. It has nothing to say about what the purposes of our foreign policy should be. I’m all for phrases and brands. But they should offer more than just a vague recipe for how we mix together our various kinds of power — hard, soft, happy, grumpy, sneezy, whatever.

I liked the idea of "a world of liberty under law" that Anne-Marie Slaughter’s Princeton Project came up with. Slaughter, so we hear, will be Clinton’s policy planning director, so maybe there’s still hope for better phrasing to come. But for now we have smart power: an unclear phrase that’s all about process and void of strategic direction. The bureaucracy is going to love this.

Christian Brose is a senior editor at Foreign Policy. He served as chief speechwriter and policy advisor for U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from 2005 to 2008, and as speechwriter for former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell from 2004 to 2005.

More from Foreign Policy

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?

The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.
Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World

It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.
Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.

Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.
Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing

The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.