What now? Barack Obama, bad boyfriends, and the good people who do dumb things
As the new foreign policy leader, Barack Obama will inherit a wonderful political gift – one that will hopefully counteract a first-year liability that will inevitably surprise him. Obama’s inheritance is the Bad Boyfriend Benefit. Personal experience, combined with the consumption of way too many Sex and the City episodes, has taught me that one ...
As the new foreign policy leader, Barack Obama will inherit a wonderful political gift - one that will hopefully counteract a first-year liability that will inevitably surprise him.
Obama's inheritance is the Bad Boyfriend Benefit. Personal experience, combined with the consumption of way too many Sex and the City episodes, has taught me that one of the easiest gigs in the world is to be the next boyfriend after a bad one. Because the contrast is so sharp, the legacy of a bad boyfriend is that if the new one is simply adecent human being, they can still have the overwhelming support of friends and family.
To put this in more concrete terms - the contrast between Bush and Obama is so sharp that he will automatically benefit by the comparison. Even when president Obama continues the policies of his predecessor, the initial focus will be on the changes rather than the continuities. This will buy the Obama administration some much-needed goodwill in its first year of office.
As the new foreign policy leader, Barack Obama will inherit a wonderful political gift – one that will hopefully counteract a first-year liability that will inevitably surprise him.
Obama’s inheritance is the Bad Boyfriend Benefit. Personal experience, combined with the consumption of way too many Sex and the City episodes, has taught me that one of the easiest gigs in the world is to be the next boyfriend after a bad one. Because the contrast is so sharp, the legacy of a bad boyfriend is that if the new one is simply adecent human being, they can still have the overwhelming support of friends and family.
To put this in more concrete terms – the contrast between Bush and Obama is so sharp that he will automatically benefit by the comparison. Even when president Obama continues the policies of his predecessor, the initial focus will be on the changes rather than the continuities. This will buy the Obama administration some much-needed goodwill in its first year of office.
The new president will need that goodwill, because it’s a virtual certainty that the administration’s first year will not be covered in foreign policy glory. In George W. Bush’s first year, the United States needlessly infuriated its allies through peremptory unilateral withdrawals from multilateral treaties. In Bill Clinton’s first year, the United States badly damaged its bilateral relationship with Japan and committed numerous blunders in Somalia. In George H.W. Bush’s first six months, the new administration dithered over how to respond to Mikhail Gorbachev.
New administrations do this, because top policymakers usually believe that their prior policymaking experience will serve them well in their new job. Except that things change. New technologies require ever faster responses. New issues force their way onto the policy agenda. New bureaucracies have to be managed. And so on.
Even if they live up to their hype, the new administration is gonna screw up. What might save them is that they will not screw up in the same way as their predecessors.
Questions to readers: on which policy dimension will the Obama administration show the greatest improvement compared to Bush? And on which dimension will they screw up?
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy
What Putin Got Right
The Russian president got many things wrong about invading Ukraine—but not everything.
Russia Has Already Lost in the Long Run
Even if Moscow holds onto territory, the war has wrecked its future.
China’s Belt and Road to Nowhere
Xi Jinping’s signature foreign policy is a “shadow of its former self.”
The U.S. Overreacted to the Chinese Spy Balloon. That Scares Me.
So unused to being challenged, the United States has become so filled with anxiety over China that sober responses are becoming nearly impossible.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
