The big squeeze, and Pakistan
The news on Afghanistan is that U.S. supply routes to it from both the north and the south are being squeezed. But I think that tactical moves will backfire, because they will focus American officials and others on the strategic requirement to deal with Pakistan differently and more emphatically. As sensei Abu Muqawama puts it, ...
The news on Afghanistan is that U.S. supply routes to it from both the north and the south are being squeezed. But I think that tactical moves will backfire, because they will focus American officials and others on the strategic requirement to deal with Pakistan differently and more emphatically. As sensei Abu Muqawama puts it, "It's tough to fight a war in Afghanistan when the opposing team decides to fight the war in Pakistan."
The Pakistani military seems to be both the problem and the solution. It won't be easy, as this great video report by an al Jazeera reported embedded with the Pakistan army in Swat shows. (The second half, not the first half, which is refugees.) It is striking to see Pakistani tanks running away from the Taliban. It reminded me of the military expert I quoted in my last post on the Wanat battle who observed that the enemy we face in Afghanistan may resemble Hezbollah in Lebanon more than al Qaeda in Iraq.
The news on Afghanistan is that U.S. supply routes to it from both the north and the south are being squeezed. But I think that tactical moves will backfire, because they will focus American officials and others on the strategic requirement to deal with Pakistan differently and more emphatically. As sensei Abu Muqawama puts it, “It’s tough to fight a war in Afghanistan when the opposing team decides to fight the war in Pakistan.”
The Pakistani military seems to be both the problem and the solution. It won’t be easy, as this great video report by an al Jazeera reported embedded with the Pakistan army in Swat shows. (The second half, not the first half, which is refugees.) It is striking to see Pakistani tanks running away from the Taliban. It reminded me of the military expert I quoted in my last post on the Wanat battle who observed that the enemy we face in Afghanistan may resemble Hezbollah in Lebanon more than al Qaeda in Iraq.
Looking at the blown bridge in the Khyber Pass, I remember reading somewhere that prime ambush sites along the Pakistani-Afghan border were passed along from generation to generation, much as Boston’s WASPs pass on vacation homes in New Hampshire. I would bet that the RPGs already are waiting on the alternative routes being considered. I’m glad I have no plans to travel through Spin Boldak anytime soon.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
