The secret genius (and hidden consequences) of the pay cap
While it almost certainly will do very little to curb the obscenely high salaries of many in finance and business, the Obama administration’s new pay cap for execs at federally bailed out companies could actually help revive key portions of the financial community and could save the government billions. Because just as we thought private ...
While it almost certainly will do very little to curb the obscenely high salaries of many in finance and business, the Obama administration's new pay cap for execs at federally bailed out companies could actually help revive key portions of the financial community and could save the government billions. Because just as we thought private equity and hedge funds were on the ropes, the new policy is bound to incent the best and the brightest at big financial firms that are struggling to move out to work in firms where the only caps they will encounter will be on the heads of their doormen and caddies. And tax-payers will benefit because top management and troubled firms will be more likely to do just about anything to avoid taking cash from the government now that there are strings attached. Of course, these rules are retro-active which makes those masters of the universe at Merrill, B of A, Citi, and AIG look great for having had the genius to fail first and thus not be subject to them.
On a more serious note, as for the promise woven into yesterday's announcement -- that the Administration will be looking for other ways to curb excessive salaries in the future, while broad stroke mandating of pay-levels seems unlikely -- it does raise some interesting questions.
While it almost certainly will do very little to curb the obscenely high salaries of many in finance and business, the Obama administration’s new pay cap for execs at federally bailed out companies could actually help revive key portions of the financial community and could save the government billions. Because just as we thought private equity and hedge funds were on the ropes, the new policy is bound to incent the best and the brightest at big financial firms that are struggling to move out to work in firms where the only caps they will encounter will be on the heads of their doormen and caddies. And tax-payers will benefit because top management and troubled firms will be more likely to do just about anything to avoid taking cash from the government now that there are strings attached. Of course, these rules are retro-active which makes those masters of the universe at Merrill, B of A, Citi, and AIG look great for having had the genius to fail first and thus not be subject to them.
On a more serious note, as for the promise woven into yesterday’s announcement — that the Administration will be looking for other ways to curb excessive salaries in the future, while broad stroke mandating of pay-levels seems unlikely — it does raise some interesting questions.
For example, while it is hard to imagine how the government could regulate salaries in private companies that aren’t taking tax-payer dollars, it’s equally hard to understand why one set of companies receiving tax-payer dollars should be treated differently from another. So, if I were a financial services executive who had to set aside my Lamborghini catalogue, I might ask what the government will next do about say, the compensation of defense and aerospace executives whose companies largely depend on revenues from the USG. According to Forbes, for example, in 2007 average total compensation of CEOs of defense and aerospace firms was $20.6 million. (Average Fortune 500 chief execs earned “only” $12.6 million by comparison.) So these guys are also getting rich feeding at the public trough.
Back to you, Mr. President…
Win McNamee/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
Lessons for the Next War
Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.
It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse
Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.
Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine
The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.
Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.
Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
