What will the G20 accomplish?
Henry Farrell points out the political reasons for why regulatory coordination is unlikely to take place at the G20 summit this April. To lift and/or depress Henry’s spirits, however, there’s this FT story by Tony Barber: The US and the European Union are finding common ground in their efforts to strengthen global financial market regulation in ...
Henry Farrell points out the political reasons for why regulatory coordination is unlikely to take place at the G20 summit this April. To lift and/or depress Henry's spirits, however, there's this FT story by Tony Barber:
Henry Farrell points out the political reasons for why regulatory coordination is unlikely to take place at the G20 summit this April. To lift and/or depress Henry’s spirits, however, there’s this FT story by Tony Barber:
The US and the European Union are finding common ground in their efforts to strengthen global financial market regulation in spite of differences between Anglo-American and continental European cultures, the European Commission’s president said on Friday.
Speaking on the final day of a two-day EU summit in Brussels, José Manuel Barroso predicted that, if the push for tighter regulation ran into obstacles, they might come from big emerging countries such as China rather than the US or UK.
“While I recognise there are differences of legal and financial culture between the so-called Anglo-Saxon and continental models, what I see as a trend is convergence, and not at all that there’s some big fight,” Mr Barroso said.
Referring to a London G20 summit on April 2 of the world’s advanced and emerging economies, he told reporters: “The main problem will come from other countries, like China, for example, that don’t have the culture of a common setting of rules.”
Given the outcome of the G20 Finance Ministers meeting, I agree that there might be less of a transatlantic rift than political scientists would predict. A bargain on regulatory and fiscal arrangements seems quite doable.
On the other hand, that China language coming from Barroso is a bit odd. Having written a book about this, I’d point out that it’s not that China doesn’t have a "culture of a common setting of rules." It’s that until very, very recently, China wasn’t invited to the table to write these rules.
One last thing: this bears watching.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
