First Things first
Over at the First Things blog, Keith Pavlischek seems to think that I am off base in thinking our presence in Iraq immoral, but thinking also that leaving would be more immoral. He calls me out for supposedly disagreeing with St. Thomas Aquinas. Yet I think Aquinas’s second condition for waging war justly, which he ...
Over at the First Things blog, Keith Pavlischek seems to think that I am off base in thinking our presence in Iraq immoral, but thinking also that leaving would be more immoral. He calls me out for supposedly disagreeing with St. Thomas Aquinas. Yet I think Aquinas's second condition for waging war justly, which he cites, underscores my point: "Secondly, a just cause is required...."
Over at the First Things blog, Keith Pavlischek seems to think that I am off base in thinking our presence in Iraq immoral, but thinking also that leaving would be more immoral. He calls me out for supposedly disagreeing with St. Thomas Aquinas. Yet I think Aquinas’s second condition for waging war justly, which he cites, underscores my point: “Secondly, a just cause is required….”
I’ve written to Pavlischek and to First Things asking how invading Iraq pre-emptively on false premises meets that standard. No responses yet.
Lawrence OP/Flickr
More from Foreign Policy


At Long Last, the Foreign Service Gets the Netflix Treatment
Keri Russell gets Drexel furniture but no Senate confirmation hearing.


How Macron Is Blocking EU Strategy on Russia and China
As a strategic consensus emerges in Europe, France is in the way.


What the Bush-Obama China Memos Reveal
Newly declassified documents contain important lessons for U.S. China policy.


Russia’s Boom Business Goes Bust
Moscow’s arms exports have fallen to levels not seen since the Soviet Union’s collapse.