Gates takes his (irregular) war to the Hill
By Dov Zakheim Secretary Gates is on the Hill today to defend his decision, before a not entirely friendly audience, to cut some heavy weapons systems and invest more instead on irregular war. He is right to press for capabilities that are important to those wars — unmanned aerial vehicles, for example. Still, Gates has ...
By Dov Zakheim
By Dov Zakheim
Secretary Gates is on the Hill today to defend his decision, before a not entirely friendly audience, to cut some heavy weapons systems and invest more instead on irregular war. He is right to press for capabilities that are important to those wars — unmanned aerial vehicles, for example. Still, Gates has overcompensated for irregular wars. And by emphasizing cyber warfare, which represents the most sophisticated technologies that could be launched against us, he is implicitly conceding that we must worry about major peer competitors. The cutbacks in major conventional systems, notably naval systems, seem out of "synch" with the emphasis on cyber warfare. Similarly, cutbacks in airlift programs, and of the C-17 in particular, are inconsistent with increases in Army end-strength.
Gates appears to assume that no peer competitor could emerge within the next fifteen to twenty years. Yet both Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia both became superpowers within a shorter time frame: it took Germany less than a decade from Hitler’s rise to power until the fall of France; the Soviet Union took less than two decades from Lenin’s death to the defeat of Germany. Taking Moore’s law into account, the pace of military growth is potentially much greater than it was some seventy years ago. We could confront a conventional threat within fifteen years — and perhaps even sooner.
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
