Admiral Mullen: Drone strikes in Pakistan are “very effective”
Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, apparently rejects the argument made by my CNAS colleagues Andrew Exum and David Kilcullen that Predator drone strikes in Pakistan are strategically counterproductive and should be drastically curtailed. If all you want to do is kill al Qaeda, they’re great. But if your larger strategic ...
Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, apparently rejects the argument made by my CNAS colleagues Andrew Exum and David Kilcullen that Predator drone strikes in Pakistan are strategically counterproductive and should be drastically curtailed. If all you want to do is kill al Qaeda, they're great. But if your larger strategic goal is to try to help Pakistan from collapsing into the arms of Islamic extremists, maybe not such a good idea.
This is what Mullen had to say Monday about the strikes when asked at a Brookings Institution session:
Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, apparently rejects the argument made by my CNAS colleagues Andrew Exum and David Kilcullen that Predator drone strikes in Pakistan are strategically counterproductive and should be drastically curtailed. If all you want to do is kill al Qaeda, they’re great. But if your larger strategic goal is to try to help Pakistan from collapsing into the arms of Islamic extremists, maybe not such a good idea.
This is what Mullen had to say Monday about the strikes when asked at a Brookings Institution session:
As far as drone attacks themselves are concerned, the — we have — I have found them to be, and the commanders in the field have found them to be, very effective. I think they speak to not only effectiveness in these — in these kinds of campaigns, but also they speak to our future with respect to where we should go in the unmanned world. But they have to be done in a way that moves the strategy forward and doesn’t back us up.”
But as I understood it, the point Ex and the Crocodile (the Hootie and the Blowfish of the COIN world) were making was that the strikes DON’T move the strategy forward. So Mullen seems caught in an contradiction. He contains multitudes.
Old Steve Coll, who knows his Af-Pak from his elbow, discusses all this in his blog. But then he gets into a whole bunch of “narrative” stuff.
David McNew/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
Lessons for the Next War
Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.
It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse
Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.
Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine
The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.
Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.
Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
