Why Cuba won’t join the OAS
That pesky little detail about “democracy”… By Lino Gutierrez On September 11, 2001, minutes after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, representatives of the Organization of American States (OAS) in Lima, Peru, signed the Inter-American Democratic Charter, a document that established that only democracies could be members of the organization. Last ...
That pesky little detail about "democracy"...
By Lino Gutierrez
That pesky little detail about “democracy”…
By Lino Gutierrez
On September 11, 2001, minutes after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, representatives of the Organization of American States (OAS) in Lima, Peru, signed the Inter-American Democratic Charter, a document that established that only democracies could be members of the organization. Last week, representatives of the same organization, which expelled Cuba in 1962, rescinded Cuba’s expulsion and invited the hemisphere’s lone Marxist dictatorship to return.
What happened in eight years? For one thing, the regional dynamics have shifted. After September 11, many believed that the United States, occupied elsewhere in the world, was paying little attention to its own backyard. Latin American countries, moreover, were never comfortable with the Iraq war. Even Chile and Mexico, usually staunch Washington allies, failed to provide needed votes when the United States sought the U.N. Security Council’s approval to take Baghdad. Abu Ghraib, reports of civilian casualties, and George W. Bush’s personal unpopularity all contributed to a precipitous drop in the U.S. image across the region.
Things changed for Cuba, too. Once a feared, Soviet-backed promoter of worldwide revolution, the Castro regime got new support thanks to the election of populist leaders like Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez, Bolivia’s Evo Morales, and Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega — all of whom are admirers of Fidel. Suddenly, it is politically correct to welcome Cuba back to the family like a prodigal son. Under the leadership of Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva, the Rio Group, a collection of Latin American democracies, asked Cuba to join its ranks late last year (Cuba accepted). At least eight hemisphere presidents have visited the island of late, all getting the requisite picture with the ailing Fidel in his track suit (none of these official visitors asks about or visits Cuba’s brave dissidents).
In the United States, too, some members of Congress are calling for an end to the 47-year-old trade embargo and travel ban. Although President Barack Obama has affirmed that libertad (freedom) will be the cornerstone of his Cuba policy, he has called for a new approach. Obama fulfilled his campaign promise to lift the Bush administration controls on remittances and travel by Cuban-Americans to visit their relatives in Cuba — a measure that will mean additional foreign exchange for Cuba. Now, the U.S. president has called for Cuba to reciprocate.
The OAS would have been a great chance for Cuba to do just that. But Cuba won’t rejoin the organization, which Fidel Castro once called a “Yankee bordello,” anytime soon. The island’s leaders did hail the OAS’s invitation as a great victory, of course. But becoming an OAS member would subject Cuba to the kind of international scrutiny it has avoided for the past half century. The invitation calls for Cuba to rejoin the organization and commit to its established norms — including the Democratic Charter. And while Venezuela and its allies would gladly give Cuba a pass, the United States, Canada, and others would require that Cuba at least begin a process that leads toward democracy.
That is a process that Cuba will not undertake so long as the Castro brothers are in charge. Though Fidel is no longer on stage, he continues to influence decisions behind the scenes. Brother Raúl seems to be open to more dialogue with the United States, and many Cubans hoped he was a closet reformer. But after announcing some modest economic reforms in 2008 (Cubans can now stay in tourist hotels), the regime seems to have retrenched and closed ranks, as the recent firing of reform-minded economist Carlos Lage and Foreign Minister Felipe Pérez Roque seems to indicate. Both Fidel and Raul have said that, while they’re willing to talk to the United States, the revolution’s principles are non-negotiable.
Curiously, the variable in the present equation is none other than Obama. Despite Fidel’s boast of having outlasted 10 U.S. presidents, neither he nor Raúl have dared take on the popular U.S. president. Cubans are fascinated with Obama, having been told by the Castros for years that blacks were second-class citizens and that no African-American could ever hope to be in a position of power in the United States. In a country that is 60 percent Afro-Cuban, Obama’s very election has sparked new hope among many that things could at last get better. How and when this will happen remains to be seen — but at least for now, Cuba’s future won’t be in the OAS.
Lino Gutierrez was the U.S. ambassador to Argentina from 2003 to 2006.
Photo: ADALBERTO ROQUE/AFP/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.