The longest day…
Where am I? My eyes are open and my fingers are moving across the keyboard so I know I am awake. But it feels a little like morning and the sky says night, a little like Asia and the signs say Europe, I woke up in Japan and my next meeting is in Brazil and ...
Where am I? My eyes are open and my fingers are moving across the keyboard so I know I am awake. But it feels a little like morning and the sky says night, a little like Asia and the signs say Europe, I woke up in Japan and my next meeting is in Brazil and it will be 72 hours between the last time I slept in a bed and the next time I do.
I saw G.I. Jane. I know how hard it is for Navy SEALs. But Demi Moore would be curled up in the fetal position if she had to take this trip. (By the way, for an interesting perspective on the times, watch that movie sometime. No, not for Demi’s one-handed push ups or the great chemistry with Viggo. But because when they are trying to break her as she seeks to become the first woman SEAL they actually waterboard her. And when someone complains that it looks uncomfortable, Viggo responds “that’s why it’s such an effective interrogation technique.” Who knew such a cheeseball movie could be so trenchantly topical?)
Where was I? Oh, right. The question is where I am? Somewhere between “Where’s Waldo?” and “Where in the World is Carmen San Diego?” I think? Round about there. Actually it looks a lot like the giant human terrarium that is Heathrow’s Terminal Five. But it seems oddly pleasant at the moment. It could be all that Immodium coursing through my system. Or the fact that my last stop was Narita. If I die and awake and the first thing I see is Narita Airport I will know that Higher Powers did not approve of my dissolute life. Narita is the Miami International Airport of East Asia. Just like Mumbai is the Miami International Airport of the subcontinent. And just like root canal surgery is the Miami International Airport of things you can do with your mouth.
I pick up a newspaper to orient myself. Seems like there is still upheaval and unease in Tehran. Still precious little reaction out of the Obama Administration about this. Obama’s brief statement of concern said more with what was left out than what was actually said. I know that Obama will still have to deal with whatever Iranian government is left standing, but I wonder if he’s being a bit too measured or and carefully calibrated for its own good? Sometimes, after all, a little righteous indignation is exactly what’s called for. (And where, by the way is Hillary Clinton these days?)
I’m of two minds on all this. Which is not so bad considering at the moment I am of about four time zones. On the one hand, I am all for restraint. Particularly given that the opposition candidate, Mousavi, is not exactly a wonderful guy as far as I can tell and would soon be a big pain in our American arse (wait, I said “arse”…this must be England) even in the best moments of successful engagement. And there’s a lot to be said for a foreign policy that actually involves thinking before acting, especially when the evidence about the election is, well, not really evidence yet.
On the other hand, I know in my heart that Ahmadinejad, who looks more like a ferret with every passing day, stole the election and I love the vigorous and vital nature of the opposition. Iran has a democracy in it waiting to be allowed to be free and what a great game changer that would be for almost every policy concern we have in the region, especially if a freer Iran was also not as resolutely anti-U.S. as the current crew. I also don’t much like that hanging back has left it to the Euros like Merkel, Sarkozy and Brown to lead in the strong condemnation, summoning ambassadors department. But hey, that’s such a novelty it’s almost as exciting as the real challenge to Ahmadinejad.
I guess I would rather see the United States vigorously orchestrating a challenge to the apparently stolen election both because it’s right and because they shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it if indeed they stole it (which of course, they did) and if indeed the Guardian Council review is a sham (which of course, it will be.) I also don’t think we’re building up a great track record when it comes to how we treat provocations from our enemies (North Korea or Iran) or obscene behavior from our allies (see the CNN piece on the Karzai regime’s violence against journalists.) Reason and cool I like. But I worry that we are a step away from seeming paralyzed by pragmatism.
But really what I would rather see is a bed.
More from Foreign Policy
No, the World Is Not Multipolar
The idea of emerging power centers is popular but wrong—and could lead to serious policy mistakes.
America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.
America Can’t Stop China’s Rise
And it should stop trying.
The Morality of Ukraine’s War Is Very Murky
The ethical calculations are less clear than you might think.