Is Britain trying to cover up torture?
The British government may have tried to preempt charges that it has engaged in torture, the BBC reports today: Rangzieb Ahmed, from Rochdale, said he was offered a shorter jail term if he would drop claims UK officials were involved in his alleged torture. Ahmed was jailed for life in December for directing terrorism. In ...
The British government may have tried to preempt charges that it has engaged in torture, the BBC reports today:
The British government may have tried to preempt charges that it has engaged in torture, the BBC reports today:
Rangzieb Ahmed, from Rochdale, said he was offered a shorter jail term if he would drop claims UK officials were involved in his alleged torture.
Ahmed was jailed for life in December for directing terrorism. In the trial, Ahmed said he was tortured in Pakistan.
A government spokesperson goes on to assure that "MI5 agents always operate within the law." But exactly what laws are in question?
Certainly not international law, which categorically prohibits torture outright. Though the House of Lords ruled in 2005 that evidence procured through torture is inadmissible in British court, Human Rights Watch still accuses the Britain of outsourcing its torture to countries like Algeria, Jordan and, yes, Pakistan.
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.