The growth of MNSTC-I
I was intrigued by this comment posted in response to Col. Dave Maxwell’s guest commentary in this blog last week eon the inexorable growth of U.S. military organizations: When created under then LTG Petraeus it was a tight little organization with about 4 total general officers and upwards of 1400 personnel over 55 locations. As ...
I was intrigued by this comment posted in response to Col. Dave Maxwell’s guest commentary in this blog last week eon the inexorable growth of U.S. military organizations:
When created under then LTG Petraeus it was a tight little organization with about 4 total general officers and upwards of 1400 personnel over 55 locations. As of last fall it now has…you aren’t going to believe this…13 general officers and two SES civilians (GO equivalents) over far less locations and the same personnel or less. How does an organization with actually less mission than it had (the MiTT’s and PTT’s all went over to MNC-I in 2006) grow the number of senior positions? All of these new organizations mean other staffs are drained of personnel to fill the all important combat mission.
Anyone got a good explanation for this growth of the top end?
Sniper One/Flickr
More from Foreign Policy


Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.


Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.


It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.


Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.