Clinton: New reality demands different ‘global architecture’
Hillary Clinton, Council on Foreign Relations, July 15, 2009 | KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images In her superb foreign-policy speech today at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Secretary Clinton (with her right arm free from a sling) presented an “ambitious agenda” that included the call for a different “global architecture” and announced that the United States was ...
In her superb foreign-policy speech today at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Secretary Clinton (with her right arm free from a sling) presented an “ambitious agenda” that included the call for a different “global architecture” and announced that the United States was ready for engagement with Iran, though only for a limited window of time.
Hopefully now, all the talk of Clinton in the shadows has been put to rest.
Paraphrasing from my notes:
On global governance: No nation can solve the world’s problems on its own. Most countries worry about the same threats. These two facts demand a different global architecture — an architecture of cooperation. Not only are multilateral institutions important, but so are partnerships with people, including outreach through educational and entrepreneurial programs and connecting through technology.
On the new approach: The “you’re with us or against us” approach is “global malpractice.”
On Iran’s election: Clinton said she was “appalled” by the way in which the Iranian government responded to protesters after June 12’s disputed election.
On engaging Iran: Clinton said direct talks were the best way to get through to Iran on nuclear arms. However, she said the opportunity for talks would not remain open indefinitely. (Clinton did not say when that window of opportunity would close, though.)
On foreign aid: In keeping with the idea of “smart power,” foreign assistance should be provided in an efficient manner to implement country-driven solutions. Development must focus on women as drivers of economic growth and a key to stability.
On the Taliban: Clinton talked about accepting members of the Taliban who reject al Qaeda and lay down their arms. (Perhaps this came from the lessons learned from de-Baathification in Iraq?)
Perhaps alluding to a “reset” in how the United States does foreign policy, Clinton quoted Thomas Paine: “We have it in our power to start the world again.”
As a side note, when introducing her, CFR President Richard Haass noted that six other secretaries of state have gone on to become U.S. presidents. Clinton smiled and shook her head at him while the audience laughed.
Two points I’d like to know more about:
•When does the opportunity for dialogue with Iran, which Clinton warned was not “indefinite,” close exactly?
•What prompted her to talk of accepting Taliban members who reject al Qaeda and lay down their arms? In the question-and-answer session, she even said it could apply to other organizations.
Photo: KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
