Clinton supposedly suppressing torture evidence

Hillary Clinton, David Miliband, July 29, 2009 | JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images   Here are a couple of wild headlines from the British press. From The Guardian: “Clinton moved to halt disclosure of CIA torture evidence, court told“ From the Daily Mail: “Hillary Clinton threatens to cut spy links with UK over ‘torture’“ Basically, lawyers for ...

By , copy chief at Foreign Policy from 2009-2016 and was an assistant editor from 2007-2009.
582835_090730_ClintonMiliband2.jpg
582835_090730_ClintonMiliband2.jpg

 

Hillary Clinton, David Miliband, July 29, 2009 | JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images

Hillary Clinton, David Miliband, July 29, 2009 | JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images
 

Here are a couple of wild headlines from the British press.

From The Guardian:

Clinton moved to halt disclosure of CIA torture evidence, court told

From the Daily Mail:

Hillary Clinton threatens to cut spy links with UK over ‘torture’

Basically, lawyers for Binyam Mohamed, a British resident and former terrorism detainee, want the High Court to disclose a seven-paragraph summary of CIA documents that allegedly support Mohamed’s claim that British intelligence agents were complicit in his torture in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Morocco.

In a written statement, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband claims that Secretary Clinton “indicated” to him in May that if the court disclosed the CIA material, it would adversely “affect intelligence sharing.” Clinton and the CIA are also said to have written letters stating that the United States would review its intelligence-sharing practices with Britain if the court discloses the CIA material.

Human rights activists say Miliband is just using the U.S. threat to avoid having to reveal the “ugly truth” about British complicity in torture. Lord Justice Thomas was doubtful about the threat to limit intelligence sharing, saying: “So the U.S. has taken the position that this is so serious that it is prepared to reassess its relationship with the UK and put lives at risk?”

So what did Clinton say or write? It’s hard to believe that she would threaten a complete cut of intelligence sharing if the material is disclosed. Yesterday, while meeting with Miliband, above, she even said, “The issue of intelligence sharing is one that is critically important to our two countries, and we have both a stake in ensuring that it continues to the fullest extent possible.”

Photo: JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images

Preeti Aroon was copy chief at Foreign Policy from 2009-2016 and was an assistant editor from 2007-2009. Twitter: @pjaroonFP

More from Foreign Policy

Children are hooked up to IV drips on the stairs at a children's hospital in Beijing.
Children are hooked up to IV drips on the stairs at a children's hospital in Beijing.

Chinese Hospitals Are Housing Another Deadly Outbreak

Authorities are covering up the spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumonia.

Henry Kissinger during an interview in Washington in August 1980.
Henry Kissinger during an interview in Washington in August 1980.

Henry Kissinger, Colossus on the World Stage

The late statesman was a master of realpolitik—whom some regarded as a war criminal.

A Ukrainian soldier in helmet and fatigues holds a cell phone and looks up at the night sky as an explosion lights up the horizon behind him.
A Ukrainian soldier in helmet and fatigues holds a cell phone and looks up at the night sky as an explosion lights up the horizon behind him.

The West’s False Choice in Ukraine

The crossroads is not between war and compromise, but between victory and defeat.

Illustrated portraits of Reps. MIke Gallagher, right, and Raja Krishnamoorthi
Illustrated portraits of Reps. MIke Gallagher, right, and Raja Krishnamoorthi

The Masterminds

Washington wants to get tough on China, and the leaders of the House China Committee are in the driver’s seat.