Sudan Watchers Respond to Gration
A few hours after news from a blogger roundtable with U.S. Envoy to Sudan, Scott Gration, filters out (see here and here), members of the advocacy community spoke with FP about their reactions to his statements. Here’s a few key excerpts: ON MEETING WITH SUDAN’S PRESIDENT OMAR EL-BASHIR John Prendergast, co-founder of the Enough Project ...
A few hours after news from a blogger roundtable with U.S. Envoy to Sudan, Scott Gration, filters out (see here and here), members of the advocacy community spoke with FP about their reactions to his statements. Here's a few key excerpts:
A few hours after news from a blogger roundtable with U.S. Envoy to Sudan, Scott Gration, filters out (see here and here), members of the advocacy community spoke with FP about their reactions to his statements. Here’s a few key excerpts:
ON MEETING WITH SUDAN’S PRESIDENT OMAR EL-BASHIR
John Prendergast, co-founder of the Enough Project and former director of African affairs at the National Security Council
[I]f the U.S. collapsed under the weight of perceived expediency and sold its moral authority for some belief that meeting the big man, the strong man, would actually be dispositive in moving the peace process forward, I think it would be a tragic mistake. It would undermine what leverage the United States has, which is rooted in part in moral authority and in part in its advocacy for those victims and survivors of the wars in Southern Sudan and Darfur."
Jerry Fowler, president of the Save Darfur Coalition
I’m glad to hear that General Gration doesn’t plan to meet with President Bashir. U.S. officials as a general matter should refrain from meeting with indicted war criminals and should pressure other governments to do likewise."
Sam Bell, executive director of the Genocide Intervention Network
What’s worrying [about the idea that Gration doesn’t rule out a meeting with Bashir] is that we’re going to play this on Bashir’s terms. And his interests aren’t necessarily the interests of
the rest of Sudan. The advocacy community that I’m a part of is not suggesting, and never has suggested, that the special envoy should not talk with the government of Sudan. But that doesn’t have to be done with Bashir."
ON U.S. SUDAN POLICY
John Prendergast
[We believe that U.S. policy, implemented by Gration, is] heading into dangerous territory in both Darfur and in the North-South process…[On the North-South issue,] a dangerous mistake that’s being made is to allow the U.S. government to be part of a process that includes the [ruling] National Congress Party, [Southern] SPLM, and United States talking about renegotiating elements of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. This allows us to be perceived as willing to renegotiate certains things that have already been agreed upon…instead of renegotiating things that are hard, we need to demand strict implementation [of the peace process] and work to build a multilateral coalition that is willing to impose consequences for non-implemention."
Sam Bell
What makes us nervous is this narrative that Darfur is solved, Sudan is solved, and that all we need to do is talk to the two sides, and the conflicts will iron themselves out."
Elizabeth Dickinson is International Crisis Group’s senior analyst for Colombia.
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.