Power shift at the G-20

Reuters got its hands on the draft G-20 communiqué, to be issued later today, and the news agency is reporting that developing countries scored a minor coup in getting developed countries to agree to shift the balance of power within the International Monetary Fund: It called for a shift in IMF voting by at least ...

Reuters got its hands on the draft G-20 communiqué, to be issued later today, and the news agency is reporting that developing countries scored a minor coup in getting developed countries to agree to shift the balance of power within the International Monetary Fund:

Reuters got its hands on the draft G-20 communiqué, to be issued later today, and the news agency is reporting that developing countries scored a minor coup in getting developed countries to agree to shift the balance of power within the International Monetary Fund:

It called for a shift in IMF voting by at least 5 percent, although several G20 representatives said it was a 5 percentage point shift from developed to under-represented countries. Currently, the split in voting power is 57 percent for industrialized countries and 43 percent for developing countries. The shift would make the split nearly 50-50.

The BRIC countries had called for a 7 percent shift, and the Obama administration had been pushing for 5 … which it appears to have gotten. It would be the biggest-ever such shift, according to Reuters, but not quite as much as, say, China, might have wanted.

One other interesting change in the draft communiqué is that it says the head of the IMF should be chosen based on qualifications, not nationality. Guess that means the Europeans are going to lose their traditional IMF slot? Wonder if that means the World Bank doesn’t always have to be headed by an American now, too.

The bottom line: Since last year, not only has the IMF grown vastly more powerful, it will now better represent the interests of developing countries. Yes, it’s a technocratic shift that may not matter much in itself, but it’s also yet another concrete sign that power in the world is shifting away from the West.

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.