Most Valuable Migrants
If the United States had to choose between letting in an Indian computer scientist or a nanny from Mexico, it might seem like a no-brainer. But, according to a new study by Harvard economists Michael Kremer and Stanley Watt, it’s not so obvious. They found that unskilled immigrants, contrary to the conventional wisdom, can actually ...
If the United States had to choose between letting in an Indian computer scientist or a nanny from Mexico, it might seem like a no-brainer. But, according to a new study by Harvard economists Michael Kremer and Stanley Watt, it's not so obvious. They found that unskilled immigrants, contrary to the conventional wisdom, can actually reduce wage inequality and make a country richer.
If the United States had to choose between letting in an Indian computer scientist or a nanny from Mexico, it might seem like a no-brainer. But, according to a new study by Harvard economists Michael Kremer and Stanley Watt, it’s not so obvious. They found that unskilled immigrants, contrary to the conventional wisdom, can actually reduce wage inequality and make a country richer.
Kremer explains his findings by pointing out that domestic workers can increase a country’s supply of highly skilled workers by allowing well-educated parents (generally mothers) to remain in the workforce. Household help is actually far more liberating to parents than day care, he argues, because nannies let them work the long hours required by many high-powered, high-paying jobs.
The findings aren’t limited to the United States. According to the study, countries can boost their gross domestic product by as much as 1.2 percent by allowing foreign household workers to make up 7 percent of their labor force — just as Hong Kong (6.8 percent) and Singapore (7 percent) do. Not surprisingly, these economies have seen even higher rates of workforce participation among women between the ages of 25 and 34 than the United States, where foreign household workers account for only 0.3 percent of the country’s workforce.
Not everyone, however, is convinced. Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, D.C., disputes Kremer’s conclusions, arguing that importing more household help will be a "double-whammy" that drives down wages for poor Americans and further burdens taxpayer-funded social services. He also notes survey data that suggest that "people want the ability to stay home, rather than the ability to hire someone to take care of their kids." But then again, with neither the demands of childrearing nor the rigors of corporate America on the decline, nanny might know best.
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
