No Right to Party
Can a political party be too responsive to its constituents? Yes, according to British and European electoral law. Your Party, a new British political party launched in February 2004, has no platform beyond that determined by its members via Internet voting. Your Party’s representatives are bound to vote as the online membership dictates. Such direct ...
Can a political party be too responsive to its constituents? Yes, according to British and European electoral law.
Can a political party be too responsive to its constituents? Yes, according to British and European electoral law.
Your Party, a new British political party launched in February 2004, has no platform beyond that determined by its members via Internet voting. Your Party’s representatives are bound to vote as the online membership dictates. Such direct democracy is illegal, according to Philip Cowley and Richard Whitaker, political scientists at the University of Nottingham who argue Your Party violates European Parliament rules prohibiting members from being contractually obliged to vote a certain way. Further challenges may result from a 1947 British ruling that says parliamentarians must avoid "controlling or limiting the member’s complete independence and freedom of action."
The debate over representative vs. direct democracy isn’t new in Britain. In 1774, British philosopher and politician Edmund Burke explained to electors in Bristol why he sometimes voted against their wishes. "Your representative owes you, not his industry only," Burke argued, "but his judgment."
More from Foreign Policy

No, the World Is Not Multipolar
The idea of emerging power centers is popular but wrong—and could lead to serious policy mistakes.

America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want
Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.

America Can’t Stop China’s Rise
And it should stop trying.

The Morality of Ukraine’s War Is Very Murky
The ethical calculations are less clear than you might think.