Digital Hancocks
When the European Directive on Electronic Signatures was launched in 1999, it was hailed as a major step toward widespread implementation of e-signatures — encryption technology used to authenticate the content of a document and verify its creator. But only Germany and Austria complied. Then, in June 2000, then U.S. President Bill Clinton used an ...
When the European Directive on Electronic Signatures was launched in 1999, it was hailed as a major step toward widespread implementation of e-signatures -- encryption technology used to authenticate the content of a document and verify its creator. But only Germany and Austria complied. Then, in June 2000, then U.S. President Bill Clinton used an electronic smart card to sign the Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign) into law. The step made e-signatures, which are more difficult to forge than those in ink, legally binding in America. At the time, proponents envisioned an e-business boom. Disappointingly, nothing much happened.
When the European Directive on Electronic Signatures was launched in 1999, it was hailed as a major step toward widespread implementation of e-signatures — encryption technology used to authenticate the content of a document and verify its creator. But only Germany and Austria complied. Then, in June 2000, then U.S. President Bill Clinton used an electronic smart card to sign the Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign) into law. The step made e-signatures, which are more difficult to forge than those in ink, legally binding in America. At the time, proponents envisioned an e-business boom. Disappointingly, nothing much happened.
Today, digital signatures seem to be undergoing a rebirth. Governments seeking lower costs and increased efficiency are leading the way. In March, U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham (www.energy.gov) used a digital signature to send President George W. Bush a nuclear waste proposal, the first time a U.S. cabinet-level official digitally signed a formal recommendation to the president. The move reportedly saved his department nearly $1 million in copying and paper costs. In February, Bermuda’s Ministry of Telecommunications and E-commerce (www.mtec.bm), in an attempt to attract e-businesses to the island, set out to issue "dig sigs" to its entire population of 63,500 by year’s end. And in January, the German government (www.bundesregierung.de) enacted legislation giving digital signatures to all of its federal employees, more than 200,000 in all.
These steps are being encouraged by a group of private-sector firms that stand to make billions from e-signature technology. VeriSign Inc. (www.verisign.com) and Entrust (www.entrust.com) are two examples. Abraham used VeriSign’s technology to send the digital memo to Bush. "As more governments become standardized on… digital signature technology, it will become easier for world leaders to interact electronically in a secure manner," says an Entrust spokeswoman. But critics like People for Internet Responsibility (PFIR) (www.pfir.org) say the devil is in the details. "What happens typically is that you have a mechanism like this that people think is reliable and trustworthy, but because of the underlying infrastructure it’s put on — the Internet, for example — it’s always vulnerable to attack," says PFIR cofounder Peter G. Neumann. It appears the ink on this issue hasn’t dried just yet.
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.