Is Internet censorship making a comeback in Russia?
Kremlin likes to boast that, unlike China, it doesn’t censor the Web. That claim always comes with a disclaimer: they don’t censor the Web except for a few extremist sites. Apparently, the list of extremist sites is always changing and sites belonging to the shrinking liberal opposition often now make the cut as well. See ...
Kremlin likes to boast that, unlike China, it doesn't censor the Web. That claim always comes with a disclaimer: they don't censor the Web except for a few extremist sites. Apparently, the list of extremist sites is always changing and sites belonging to the shrinking liberal opposition often now make the cut as well. See the following disturbing item in The Moscow Times:
Kremlin likes to boast that, unlike China, it doesn’t censor the Web. That claim always comes with a disclaimer: they don’t censor the Web except for a few extremist sites. Apparently, the list of extremist sites is always changing and sites belonging to the shrinking liberal opposition often now make the cut as well. See the following disturbing item in The Moscow Times:
Moscow-based users of the Yota provider have been unable to access web sites such as Garry Kasparov’s Kasparov.ru, Solidarity’s Rusolidarnost.ru and the banned National Bolshevik Party’s Nazbol.ru over the past few weeks, bloggers and the sites’ editors said.
Access also was patchy until Sunday to the site of opposition magazine The New Times, its web editor Ilya Barabanov said Monday.
Yota denied that it was blocking those sites. But Denis Sverdlov, chief executive of WiMax operator Skartel, which runs the Yota brand, did acknowledge that Yota blocks access to sites that are classified as extremist by the Justice Ministry. Because of that, Yota users cannot open the Chechen rebel web site Kavkazcenter.com.
…Bloggers, meanwhile, are rattled by an audio file posted online Sunday in which a female voice — purportedly of a Yota support representative — says Kasparov’s and Solidarity’s sites are blocked because they are on that list.
And of course, the most surreal thing is that Yota is co-owned by Russian Technologies, which is itself a state corporation (I’ve blogged about Yota’s expansion into Latin America – possibly driven by Russia’s geopolitical interests – in the past).
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
