A Marine’s Afghan AAR (VII): How and when to shoot
Here CWO2/Gunner Keith Marine recommends less shooting, more assaulting: Fire Discipline and marksmanship fundamentals. Got to get your guys to buy in to only shooting at targets. I think we did a good job of this but there were some units who got engaged by an estimated enemy force of fire team size and managed ...
Here CWO2/Gunner Keith Marine recommends less shooting, more assaulting:
Fire Discipline and marksmanship fundamentals. Got to get your guys to buy in to only shooting at targets. I think we did a good job of this but there were some units who got engaged by an estimated enemy force of fire team size and managed to shoot 4 magazines per man for a platoon -- complete horseshit. I think everyone realizes that the enemy generally does a good job of selecting firing positions with a decent amount of cover and concealment. If 4 guys are shooting at you, probably not 4 or 5 guys from your side can identify the positions. In addition, the guy who is waiting for a target will see a Marine shooting at a random bush or window and believe that's where the bad guys are and add his fires to the mix, next thing you know you have an entire squad/platoon dumping rounds into an empty bush or window and there is so much fire from your side of the canal, you don't know if or where fire from the other side is coming.
This boils down to training, unit discipline, and whether or not the individual Marines have combat action ribbons. Suggest you speak with the officers and convince your commander that if an incident appears where a platoon shoots a few thousand 5.56 and some rockets at an estimated 3-4 enemy, while rapidly turning in CAR requests a preliminary inquiry should soon follow with some punitive action. The guys who only shoot at targets and employs his weapon systems to his advantage will overwhelm and defeat these clowns over here every time. The guys who sit back and shoot a lot, while awaiting fire support, just make noise and waste money and convince the Taliban to continue attacking.
Here CWO2/Gunner Keith Marine recommends less shooting, more assaulting:
Fire Discipline and marksmanship fundamentals. Got to get your guys to buy in to only shooting at targets. I think we did a good job of this but there were some units who got engaged by an estimated enemy force of fire team size and managed to shoot 4 magazines per man for a platoon — complete horseshit. I think everyone realizes that the enemy generally does a good job of selecting firing positions with a decent amount of cover and concealment. If 4 guys are shooting at you, probably not 4 or 5 guys from your side can identify the positions. In addition, the guy who is waiting for a target will see a Marine shooting at a random bush or window and believe that’s where the bad guys are and add his fires to the mix, next thing you know you have an entire squad/platoon dumping rounds into an empty bush or window and there is so much fire from your side of the canal, you don’t know if or where fire from the other side is coming.
This boils down to training, unit discipline, and whether or not the individual Marines have combat action ribbons. Suggest you speak with the officers and convince your commander that if an incident appears where a platoon shoots a few thousand 5.56 and some rockets at an estimated 3-4 enemy, while rapidly turning in CAR requests a preliminary inquiry should soon follow with some punitive action. The guys who only shoot at targets and employs his weapon systems to his advantage will overwhelm and defeat these clowns over here every time. The guys who sit back and shoot a lot, while awaiting fire support, just make noise and waste money and convince the Taliban to continue attacking.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
