Best Defense
Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

Would the Founding Fathers have invaded Iraq? (II): Bigtime historian says Yingling and Cohen both wrong

It is good to have smart friends who can correct your other educated friends. Sure beats trying to correct them myself. Here a prominent historian who has published extensively on the founding generation of Americans writes in to say that both Prof. (Lt. Col.) Paul Yingling and Prof. (consigliere emeritus) Eliot Cohen are wrong in ...

By , a former contributing editor to Foreign Policy.
Mario Tama/Getty Images
Mario Tama/Getty Images
Mario Tama/Getty Images

It is good to have smart friends who can correct your other educated friends. Sure beats trying to correct them myself. Here a prominent historian who has published extensively on the founding generation of Americans writes in to say that both Prof. (Lt. Col.) Paul Yingling and Prof. (consigliere emeritus) Eliot Cohen are wrong in their interpretations of how the Founding Fathers would have handled out current foreign policy problems:

It is good to have smart friends who can correct your other educated friends. Sure beats trying to correct them myself. Here a prominent historian who has published extensively on the founding generation of Americans writes in to say that both Prof. (Lt. Col.) Paul Yingling and Prof. (consigliere emeritus) Eliot Cohen are wrong in their interpretations of how the Founding Fathers would have handled out current foreign policy problems:

"Both our friends have it somewhat wrong or misleading. 

"For Paul:  those guys would never have invaded (except for very temporary, specific, or short-term reasons) someplace out of the hemisphere, and certainly not to spread democracy.  But they would certainly have engaged in complex schemes to defend the country or advance American empire (1765-1783 being a beautiful set of examples). 

"For Eliot: Madison in my judgment invaded Canada and took on a vastly distracted Britain (which wasn’t ‘the world’s only superpower’) for overwhelmingly defensive reasons–he botched the military and more disastrously, the domestic political foundation for the action, and meant it only for limited purposes.  And he was using the war to get at the Med pirates.  In other words, these guys WERE great schemers, but Madison wasn’t the champ of the generation–as Eliot says, Hamilton was much the worst — he had all sorts of daffy schemes in the late 1790s.  But we shouldn’t neglect Benjamin Franklin and John Adams.  Then there were the domestic schemers . . . like Aaron Burr, Sam Adams, and many others. 

Thomas E. Ricks is a former contributing editor to Foreign Policy. Twitter: @tomricks1

Read More On History | Iraq

More from Foreign Policy

Children are hooked up to IV drips on the stairs at a children's hospital in Beijing.
Children are hooked up to IV drips on the stairs at a children's hospital in Beijing.

Chinese Hospitals Are Housing Another Deadly Outbreak

Authorities are covering up the spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumonia.

Henry Kissinger during an interview in Washington in August 1980.
Henry Kissinger during an interview in Washington in August 1980.

Henry Kissinger, Colossus on the World Stage

The late statesman was a master of realpolitik—whom some regarded as a war criminal.

A Ukrainian soldier in helmet and fatigues holds a cell phone and looks up at the night sky as an explosion lights up the horizon behind him.
A Ukrainian soldier in helmet and fatigues holds a cell phone and looks up at the night sky as an explosion lights up the horizon behind him.

The West’s False Choice in Ukraine

The crossroads is not between war and compromise, but between victory and defeat.

Illustrated portraits of Reps. MIke Gallagher, right, and Raja Krishnamoorthi
Illustrated portraits of Reps. MIke Gallagher, right, and Raja Krishnamoorthi

The Masterminds

Washington wants to get tough on China, and the leaders of the House China Committee are in the driver’s seat.