Clinton on Internet freedom

You can read the full text of Secretary Clinton’s address on Internet freedom here as well as commentary from Evgeny Morozov and highlights on The Cable. I was able to attend the speech at the Newseum and from where I sat, Clinton’s speech seemed impressive in its acceptance of the nuances and ambiguities of Internet ...

By , a former associate editor at Foreign Policy.
574218_clinton5.jpg
574218_clinton5.jpg
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks on internet freedom January 21, 2010 at the Newseum in Washington, DC. "I hope that refusal to support politically-motivated censorship will become a trademark characteristic of American technology companies," Clinton said in a speech on Internet freedom at the Newseum journalism museum here. "It should be part of our national brand." AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

You can read the full text of Secretary Clinton's address on Internet freedom here as well as commentary from Evgeny Morozov and highlights on The Cable.

I was able to attend the speech at the Newseum and from where I sat, Clinton's speech seemed impressive in its acceptance of the nuances and ambiguities of Internet policy, but the vision Clinton sketched out seemed underdeveloped and lacking teeth.

It seems fairly obvious that State was rushed into sketching out this new policy by Google's China announcement last week, and some of that haste showed in the ambiguity of Clinton's remarks -- particularly the section on online anonymity and the role of private enterprise. 

You can read the full text of Secretary Clinton’s address on Internet freedom here as well as commentary from Evgeny Morozov and highlights on The Cable.

I was able to attend the speech at the Newseum and from where I sat, Clinton’s speech seemed impressive in its acceptance of the nuances and ambiguities of Internet policy, but the vision Clinton sketched out seemed underdeveloped and lacking teeth.

It seems fairly obvious that State was rushed into sketching out this new policy by Google’s China announcement last week, and some of that haste showed in the ambiguity of Clinton’s remarks — particularly the section on online anonymity and the role of private enterprise. 

I did think that Clinton’s description of Internet connectivity as a value-neutral technology — "Just as steel can be used to build hospitals or machine guns and nuclear energy can power a city or destroy it" — was an impressively realistic framing of the issue. I know Evgeny doesn’t think that Clinton developed this idea far enough, but it’s not easy to bring that level of complexity into a speech like this and she did a decent job explaining it.

Clinton’s bold promise that "countries or individuals that engage in cyber attacks should face consequences" was undercut somewhat by her weak statement on the China-Google incident.

"The United States and China have different views on this issue. And we intend to address those differences candidly and consistently," she said. I don’t think anyone in Beijing will be losing too much sleep tonight.  

A telling moment came during the brief Q&A session that followed Clinton’s remarks when the operator of a U.S.-based website supporting democracy in Libya told Clinton that his site had come under multiple attacks from hackers in recent months and asked how the U.S. could help. Clinton told him that they were studying the issue and invited his participation. 

The $15 million State is allocating to promote internet freedom and the innovation contest they are spurring are great ideas, but it’s clear that the U.S. government is still feeling its way in this new environment and hasn’t quite decided its position on several issues. Should private companies not operate in countries where Internet freedom is limited or make compromises in order to facilitate greater information access? Is it worth promoting online political discussion in authoritarian regimes if that discussion also empowers anti-American extremists? How can authorities police the Internet for extremism and cybercrime without compromising the very openness that makes it valuable?

Today’s speech was less the introduction of a new initiative or vision, than a promise to develop such a vision. The fact that Clinton is taking the above issues seriously and discussing them publicly — even if State’s position is not quite articulated — is welcome. After watching the speech, I’m still not entirely sure what "21st century statecraft" is and I’m not sure that Clinton does, or would even claim to, but the fact that Clinton is working to develop such a policy and acknowledging the complexity of the landscape is a healthy development — even if it took a nudge from Google to make it happen. 

Joshua Keating was an associate editor at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @joshuakeating

More from Foreign Policy

An illustration shows George Kennan, the father of Cold War containment strategy.
An illustration shows George Kennan, the father of Cold War containment strategy.

Is Cold War Inevitable?

A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks on the DISCLOSE Act.
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks on the DISCLOSE Act.

So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship

The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.

Chinese President Xi jinping  toasts the guests during a banquet marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China on September 30, 2019 in Beijing, China.
Chinese President Xi jinping toasts the guests during a banquet marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China on September 30, 2019 in Beijing, China.

Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?

Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.

Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar chairs a meeting in Ankara, Turkey on Nov. 21, 2022.
Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar chairs a meeting in Ankara, Turkey on Nov. 21, 2022.

Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.

Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.