What exactly is the Saudi quick fix? [UPDATED]
Anyone else intrigued by this BBC report? Imposing more sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme would not be a quick enough solution, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister has said. Prince Saud al-Faisal said the threat posed by Iran demanded a "more immediate solution" than sanctions…. Speaking at a joint Riyadh news conference with Mrs Clinton, ...
Anyone else intrigued by this BBC report?
Imposing more sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme would not be a quick enough solution, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister has said.
Prince Saud al-Faisal said the threat posed by Iran demanded a "more immediate solution" than sanctions....
Anyone else intrigued by this BBC report?
Imposing more sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme would not be a quick enough solution, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister has said.
Prince Saud al-Faisal said the threat posed by Iran demanded a "more immediate solution" than sanctions….
Speaking at a joint Riyadh news conference with Mrs Clinton, Prince Saud said: "Sanctions are a long-term solution. They may work, we can’t judge.
"But we see the issue in the shorter term maybe because we are closer to the threat… So we need an immediate resolution rather than a gradual resolution."
While the Saudi minister did not detail his vision of a quick solution in public, it is likely that options were discussed behind closed doors in the meeting between Mrs Clinton and King Abdullah, says the BBC’s Kim Ghattas, who is travelling with the top US diplomat.
Um…. beyond appeasement, what exactly are the policies that could lead to an "immediate resolution" of the Iranian nuclear program?
Seriously, I’m stumped on this point. All of the possible "immediate" options on the table — Israeli airstrike, a Saudi deterrent capability — seem equally ludicrous.
UPDATE: This Financial Times story by Abeer Allam appears to be an attempt at clarification:
Saudi foreign policy official told the French press agency on Tuesday that the kingdom was not advocating military action when Prince Saud said that sanctions were not a solution.
Riyadh was arguing that the Middle East peace process was a faster and more effective means to ease tensions in the region, the official said.
”There is no point in our spending all our time on sanctions which will not have an effect in the short term. We need something more tangible,” the offical told AFP.
”We don’t want a military strike … A military strike, we still believe, will be very counterproductive,” he said. (emphasis added)
Um….. I agree that sanctions are not a quick fix, but does anyone, anywhere believe that the Middle East peace process will be faster than other policy options? Anyone?
Here is a quick list of things that I believe will happen more quickly than a successful Middle East peace process:
1) Cold fusion;
2) Bermuda wins gold medal in men’s luge;
3) Miley Cyrus nominated for Best Actress Oscar
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and co-host of the Space the Nation podcast. Twitter: @dandrezner
More from Foreign Policy

What Putin Got Right
The Russian president got many things wrong about invading Ukraine—but not everything.

Russia Has Already Lost in the Long Run
Even if Moscow holds onto territory, the war has wrecked its future.

China’s Belt and Road to Nowhere
Xi Jinping’s signature foreign policy is a “shadow of its former self.”

The U.S. Overreacted to the Chinese Spy Balloon. That Scares Me.
So unused to being challenged, the United States has become so filled with anxiety over China that sober responses are becoming nearly impossible.