China: truth and scare
Keith Bradsher has a front-page article in NYT today on "China Drawing High-Tech Research From U.S." As is so often the case in China-rising dispatches, there’s both more and less to the story than the headline broadcasts. It’s well worth a read. As frequently happens in stories that both describe what’s happening in China and ...
Keith Bradsher has a front-page article in NYT today on "China Drawing High-Tech Research From U.S." As is so often the case in China-rising dispatches, there's both more and less to the story than the headline broadcasts. It's well worth a read.
Keith Bradsher has a front-page article in NYT today on "China Drawing High-Tech Research From U.S." As is so often the case in China-rising dispatches, there’s both more and less to the story than the headline broadcasts. It’s well worth a read.
As frequently happens in stories that both describe what’s happening in China and speculate on America’s competitive edge, some things get conflated. For instance, here’s how the article begins:
For years, many of China’s best and brightest left for the United States, where high-tech industry was more cutting-edge. But Mark R. Pinto is moving in the opposite direction.
Mr. Pinto is the first chief technology officer of a major American tech company to move to China. The company, Applied Materials, is one of Silicon Valley’s most prominent firms. It supplied equipment used to perfect the first computer chips. Today, it is the world’s biggest supplier of the equipment used to make semiconductors, solar panels and flat-panel displays …
The Chinese market is surging for electricity, cars and much more, and companies are concluding that their researchers need to be close to factories and consumers alike. Applied Materials set up its latest solar research labs here after estimating that China would be producing two-thirds of the world’s solar panels by the end of this year.
“We’re obviously not giving up on the U.S.,” Mr. Pinto said. “China needs more electricity. It’s as simple as that."
Well, Pinto himself pointed out what the headline left out: For now Allied Materials is building research facilities in China to service the large and rapidly expanding Chinese market for their products; the needs and preferences of that market will be in some ways different from those back home. But that doesn’t also mean, as he states, that Allied Materials is pulling back operations in the U.S. It may also be doing so, but that would be a different story, and wouldn’t neccessarily be the result of expanding operations in China.
As for Pinto himself, his move from the U.S. to China is an example of something else: the management gap. It’s still the case, despite the best efforts of Chinese leaders, that most top managers in China today are imported talent. They may be Americans, Europeans, or Chinese nationals, but they have been trained or spent significant time studying elsewhere. This is itself a significant fact, though not to be confused with the tech race, the greentech race, or any of the other newly dubbed "races" in which the U.S. is supposedly competing against China. I’m generally bemused by how so many business stories about China take on, or are given headlines that imply, grand geopolitical significance these days.
More from Foreign Policy

Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes
A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.

A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance
De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.

Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?
A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.

The Battle for Eurasia
China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.