Best Defense

Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

HBO’s ‘Pacific’: Someone please flush!

Here is a guest review by Eric Hammel, author of a boatload of military histories, including well-known books about the battles of Chosin Reservoir, Hue City, Khe Sanh and Beirut. Not only does he specialize in Marine Corps history, he has written more books about World War II in the Pacific than many military history ...

Jason Merritt/Getty Images
Jason Merritt/Getty Images
Jason Merritt/Getty Images

Here is a guest review by Eric Hammel, author of a boatload of military histories, including well-known books about the battles of Chosin Reservoir, Hue City, Khe Sanh and Beirut.

Not only does he specialize in Marine Corps history, he has written more books about World War II in the Pacific than many military history buffs have read, including these titles:

Islands of Hell: The U.S. Marines in the Western Pacific, 1944-1945 Carrier Strike: The Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands, October 1942 Guadalcanal: Starvation Island Guadalcanal: Decision at Sea, the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal, November 13-15, 1942 Bloody Tarawa: The 2d Marine Division, November 20-23, 1943 Iwo Jima: Portrait of a Battle: United States Marines at War in the Pacific

Here is a guest review by Eric Hammel, author of a boatload of military histories, including well-known books about the battles of Chosin Reservoir, Hue City, Khe Sanh and Beirut.

Not only does he specialize in Marine Corps history, he has written more books about World War II in the Pacific than many military history buffs have read, including these titles:

By Eric Hammel
Best Defense
guest TV reviewer

Tom Hanks is an accredited war history buff, and I think he really has put his heart into paying homage to WWII vets. His heart’s in the right place, but his head is in Hollywood.

Why should I be surprised a "docudrama" like The Pacific is shit? The whole effort behind the docu part is invested in toys such as gunner’s gloves. I long ago boycotted documentary filmmakers who want my brand to legitimize their sorry little TV vignettes. Their objective is entertainment centered on the dramatic visual, not the intellectual, and not quite the historical. If self-professed documentarians can’t get it right because they edit the talking heads to accommodate their thin film libraries, why should self-professed entertainers make a better effort, show greater concern?

Has anyone else noticed that the talking heads — nameless, unexplained vets — in The Pacific seem to be reading from scripts rather than dipping into memories? They merely mouth error-filled platitudes. Band of Brothers used interesting people with interesting observations. This is the worst way to exploit vets — making them look like idiots.

It is difficult to frame this story using this set of icons. But the people behind The Pacific volunteered for this. This is their befouled vision, perhaps with the aid of a few bought historians who were probably ignored when the script — a visual outline — was fabricated from its many disparate parts. Their good intentions ran afoul bad toilet training; they left the seat up and neglected to flush.

It all comes down to adults making bad, ill-informed, drama-driven decisions that end up befogging the teachable events in bullshit that must be the knee-jerk impulses of people trained to do what they do.

Was there not a reasonable effort made to understand that selecting relatively rare machine gunners as focus for two out of two visually entangled storylines would confuse rather than enlighten? Why is the basic philosophy of The Pacific romance while the hallmark and touchstone of Band of Brothers is true grit? Does anyone ever say "No!" to Spielberg?

Waiting to see if Part 3, etc. are better overlooks that the series was filmed and edited as a whole. I doubt it, because it’s not like a regular TV series, where the third episode is being filmed the same week the first is shown, as scripts for episodes four and five are being tweaked. This mess was conceived, edited, and market-tested as a single unit long before Part 1 appeared. So it can’t get much better. There’s no way to change to a course that’s backed by anything better than the bad decisions we’ve already seen manifested in Parts 1 and 2.

These people got hung up on knick-knacks and drama, but they sacrificed the history and clarity they implicitly promised by advertising it off Band of Brothers. That’s a dishonest coattails strategy that dishonors the memory of all who were there.

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1
Tag: Media

More from Foreign Policy

An illustration shows George Kennan, the father of Cold War containment strategy.
An illustration shows George Kennan, the father of Cold War containment strategy.

Is Cold War Inevitable?

A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks on the DISCLOSE Act.
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks on the DISCLOSE Act.

So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship

The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.

Chinese President Xi jinping  toasts the guests during a banquet marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China on September 30, 2019 in Beijing, China.
Chinese President Xi jinping toasts the guests during a banquet marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China on September 30, 2019 in Beijing, China.

Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?

Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.

Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar chairs a meeting in Ankara, Turkey on Nov. 21, 2022.
Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar chairs a meeting in Ankara, Turkey on Nov. 21, 2022.

Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.

Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.