The week that was
The issue of linkage has been on our minds of late. From the well-publicized testimony of Gen. David Petraeus underscoring the centrality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in adversely affecting U.S. strategic interests, to Roger Cohen echoing that notion in the New York Times in the language of ‘The Biden Effect’, there is a growing appreciation of the interconnectedness of, ...
The issue of linkage has been on our minds of late. From the well-publicized testimony of Gen. David Petraeus underscoring the centrality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in adversely affecting U.S. strategic interests, to Roger Cohen echoing that notion in the New York Times in the language of 'The Biden Effect', there is a growing appreciation of the interconnectedness of, and reactions to, American policies in the Middle East. On the Channel this week, Mark Perry followed up on his initial Petraeus scoop with some historical perspective on the U.S. military's relationship to the Israel-Palestine portfolio, while in a much discussed piece, Thomas Hegghammer brought to bear the debate on whether it is America's policies, or its culture writ large, that most focuses the animus of anti-Western jihadism. Money quote from Hegghammer after the break:
My claim is a moderate one: Palestine matters and should be taken into consideration by counterterrorism strategists. I am not saying that Palestine is the only cause of anti-Western jihadism or even the most important one. However, of all the causes over which Western policymakers have influence, Palestine is probably among the most significant. I am also not suggesting that active militants will lay down their arms if a peace agreement is signed. What I am saying is that in such an event, recruitment will likely be reduced. The available evidence suggests that images of dead Palestinians facilitate recruitment to anti-American jihadi organizations.
The Channel had a round up of some of the ongoing human rights questions in many Middle Eastern countries. Joe Stork uncovered the recurring trend of torture in Bahrain and the Kingdom's refusal to address such violations; Uri Zaki analyzed the Israeli Defense Forces' policy of closed military zones in Bil'in and Na'alin; Issandr El Amrani argued that Egyptian civil society is at risk as the Mubarak government moves against NGOs; and Dalia Mogahed of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies looked at new data on the freedom of women in the Middle East.
The issue of linkage has been on our minds of late. From the well-publicized testimony of Gen. David Petraeus underscoring the centrality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in adversely affecting U.S. strategic interests, to Roger Cohen echoing that notion in the New York Times in the language of ‘The Biden Effect’, there is a growing appreciation of the interconnectedness of, and reactions to, American policies in the Middle East. On the Channel this week, Mark Perry followed up on his initial Petraeus scoop with some historical perspective on the U.S. military’s relationship to the Israel-Palestine portfolio, while in a much discussed piece, Thomas Hegghammer brought to bear the debate on whether it is America’s policies, or its culture writ large, that most focuses the animus of anti-Western jihadism. Money quote from Hegghammer after the break:
My claim is a moderate one: Palestine matters and should be taken into consideration by counterterrorism strategists. I am not saying that Palestine is the only cause of anti-Western jihadism or even the most important one. However, of all the causes over which Western policymakers have influence, Palestine is probably among the most significant. I am also not suggesting that active militants will lay down their arms if a peace agreement is signed. What I am saying is that in such an event, recruitment will likely be reduced. The available evidence suggests that images of dead Palestinians facilitate recruitment to anti-American jihadi organizations.
The Channel had a round up of some of the ongoing human rights questions in many Middle Eastern countries. Joe Stork uncovered the recurring trend of torture in Bahrain and the Kingdom’s refusal to address such violations; Uri Zaki analyzed the Israeli Defense Forces’ policy of closed military zones in Bil’in and Na’alin; Issandr El Amrani argued that Egyptian civil society is at risk as the Mubarak government moves against NGOs; and Dalia Mogahed of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies looked at new data on the freedom of women in the Middle East.
And the rest…
Sasha Polakow-Suransky offered a unique historical parallel in discussing how AIPACs current support of Israel wasn’t always so unqualified–underscoring its trepidation with Israel’s dealings with apartheid South Africa in the 1980s. Shifting gears, Ben Simpfendorfer discussed the strategic interests of China in the Gulf, while Bilal Y. Saab argued that we really have no idea what Iran would do in the case of an attack on its soil.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
