Clinton makes the world safer with less plutonium

Yesterday, Secretary Clinton helped make the world a safer place by signing the Plutonium Disposition Protocol with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, as seen in these photos. Under the agreement, the United States and Russia will dispose of enough weapons-grade plutonium to make nearly 17,000 nuclear weapons. At ...

By , copy chief at Foreign Policy from 2009-2016 and was an assistant editor from 2007-2009.
Photos by Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images
Photos by Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images
Photos by Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images

Yesterday, Secretary Clinton helped make the world a safer place by signing the Plutonium Disposition Protocol with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, as seen in these photos. Under the agreement, the United States and Russia will dispose of enough weapons-grade plutonium to make nearly 17,000 nuclear weapons.

Yesterday, Secretary Clinton helped make the world a safer place by signing the Plutonium Disposition Protocol with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, as seen in these photos. Under the agreement, the United States and Russia will dispose of enough weapons-grade plutonium to make nearly 17,000 nuclear weapons.

At the signing Clinton said:

Under the agreement we are about to sign, the United States and Russia will each irreversibly and transparently dispose of no less than 34 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium. Together, that is enough material for nearly 17,000 nuclear weapons. And we will put in place the framework and infrastructure needed to dispose of even more plutonium from defense programs in the future.

The agreement provides for monitoring and inspections that will ensure that this material will never again be used for weapons or any other military purpose. By using civil nuclear reactors to dispose of the plutonium, we gain an added benefit — to produce electricity for our people, even as we remove a potential serious danger.

As FP‘s Pulitzer-winning contributor David E. Hoffman wrote recently, “Time Is of the Essence” when it comes to nuclear security. 

Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images

Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images

Preeti Aroon was copy chief at Foreign Policy from 2009-2016 and was an assistant editor from 2007-2009. Twitter: @pjaroonFP

More from Foreign Policy

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger prepares to testify before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger prepares to testify before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Was Henry Kissinger Really a Realist?

America’s most famous 20th century statesman wasn’t exactly what he claimed to be.

The leader of the Palestinian Hamas movement, Ismail Haniyeh, shakes hands with Iranian Chief of Staff for the Armed Forces Mohammad Bagheri and the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard force, General Hossein Salami, during the swearing in ceremony for Iran's new president at the parliament in the Islamic republic's capital Tehran on August 5, 2021.
The leader of the Palestinian Hamas movement, Ismail Haniyeh, shakes hands with Iranian Chief of Staff for the Armed Forces Mohammad Bagheri and the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard force, General Hossein Salami, during the swearing in ceremony for Iran's new president at the parliament in the Islamic republic's capital Tehran on August 5, 2021.

The 7 Reasons Iran Won’t Fight for Hamas

A close look at Tehran’s thinking about escalating the war in Gaza.

A globe with blocks and chunks missing from it sits atop the shoulders of a person looking into a dystopian horizon.
A globe with blocks and chunks missing from it sits atop the shoulders of a person looking into a dystopian horizon.

The Global Credibility Gap

No one power or group can uphold the international order anymore—and that means much more geopolitical uncertainty ahead.

Joaquin Phoenix (center) stars in the film "Napoleon."
Joaquin Phoenix (center) stars in the film "Napoleon."

What Ridley Scott’s ‘Napoleon’ Gets Wrong About War

The film’s ideas have poisoned military thinking for centuries.