Ban: U.N. staffers may have been killed by Afghan security forces
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon‘s office said today that a U.N. board of inquiry has concluded that four U.N. staffers may have been killed by Afghan security forces who might have mistaken them for Taliban insurgents. Ban’s spokesman said the U.N. chief has called on the Afghan authorities to conduct a "thorough investigation" into their deaths. ...
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's office said today that a U.N. board of inquiry has concluded that four U.N. staffers may have been killed by Afghan security forces who might have mistaken them for Taliban insurgents.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon‘s office said today that a U.N. board of inquiry has concluded that four U.N. staffers may have been killed by Afghan security forces who might have mistaken them for Taliban insurgents.
Ban’s spokesman said the U.N. chief has called on the Afghan authorities to conduct a "thorough investigation" into their deaths. He has also called on his top aides to meet with top Afghan officials and NATO commanders to address failings in their communications with the United Nations.
The U.N. staff were attacked in a pre-dawn raid by Taliban insurgents who were seeking to disrupt the country’s planned presidential runoff. But the U.N. findings, which were first reported by Turtle Bay last week, indicated that they may have been killed by Afghan security forces that came to their aid.
Colum Lynch was a staff writer at Foreign Policy between 2010 and 2022. Twitter: @columlynch
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.