Mearsheimer on the future of Palestine
Last week I raised the question of what the United States will do if the two-state solution in the Middle East becomes an impossibility. My compatriot John Mearsheimer has gone one step further, in a hard-hitting speech that you ought to read or watch. He believes the two-state solution is no longer possible, and that ...
Last week I raised the question of what the United States will do if the two-state solution in the Middle East becomes an impossibility. My compatriot John Mearsheimer has gone one step further, in a hard-hitting speech that you ought to read or watch. He believes the two-state solution is no longer possible, and that the next phase will be struggle for Palestinian rights within a "greater Israel." A key element of that struggle will be inside the Jewish Diaspora, between those he terms "Righteous Jews" (i.e., those who favor universal human rights), and "the New Afrikaners" (i.e., those who will defend "greater Israel" no matter how it treats its Palestinian subjects).
I'm not as pessimistic as John is on this front (i.e., I think there is still a slim window open for a viable two-state solution, though the door is closing). In fact, I hope his speech turns out to be a "self-denying prophecy." In other words, if enough people are convinced by it, maybe they will act to head off the gloomy future that he foresees.
Last week I raised the question of what the United States will do if the two-state solution in the Middle East becomes an impossibility. My compatriot John Mearsheimer has gone one step further, in a hard-hitting speech that you ought to read or watch. He believes the two-state solution is no longer possible, and that the next phase will be struggle for Palestinian rights within a "greater Israel." A key element of that struggle will be inside the Jewish Diaspora, between those he terms "Righteous Jews" (i.e., those who favor universal human rights), and "the New Afrikaners" (i.e., those who will defend "greater Israel" no matter how it treats its Palestinian subjects).
I’m not as pessimistic as John is on this front (i.e., I think there is still a slim window open for a viable two-state solution, though the door is closing). In fact, I hope his speech turns out to be a "self-denying prophecy." In other words, if enough people are convinced by it, maybe they will act to head off the gloomy future that he foresees.
Stephen M. Walt is a columnist at Foreign Policy and the Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University. Twitter: @stephenwalt
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
