The radicalization of Faisal Shahzad

The radicalization of Faisal Shazad raises important questions for three sets of actors: the people and government of Pakistan, U.S. intelligence and law enforcement, and American Muslims. Before delving into these aspects further, allow me to present my basic theory about how he got radicalized. Based partly on my studies of Muslim youth in the ...

The radicalization of Faisal Shazad raises important questions for three sets of actors: the people and government of Pakistan, U.S. intelligence and law enforcement, and American Muslims. Before delving into these aspects further, allow me to present my basic theory about how he got radicalized. Based partly on my studies of Muslim youth in the West, I suspect that Shahzad was first influenced by various websites that encourage and propagate extremist religious views, mixing religious bigotry and dogma with conspiracy theories specifically targeting a younger generation of Muslims living in the West. Secondly, Faisal likely searched for militant training camps in and around Pakistan's troubled frontier after he decided he would try to conduct a terrorist attack in the United States. Economic distress might also have played a role in his radicalization, though the choice of target implies that something greater than personal grievance was at play -- Times Square might have been suggested by his militant trainers in Waziristan, who are well aware of New York's symbolic importance.

The radicalization of Faisal Shazad raises important questions for three sets of actors: the people and government of Pakistan, U.S. intelligence and law enforcement, and American Muslims. Before delving into these aspects further, allow me to present my basic theory about how he got radicalized. Based partly on my studies of Muslim youth in the West, I suspect that Shahzad was first influenced by various websites that encourage and propagate extremist religious views, mixing religious bigotry and dogma with conspiracy theories specifically targeting a younger generation of Muslims living in the West. Secondly, Faisal likely searched for militant training camps in and around Pakistan’s troubled frontier after he decided he would try to conduct a terrorist attack in the United States. Economic distress might also have played a role in his radicalization, though the choice of target implies that something greater than personal grievance was at play — Times Square might have been suggested by his militant trainers in Waziristan, who are well aware of New York’s symbolic importance.

In this context, Pakistan’s government and military must recognize fully that moving against all varieties of militancy and terrorism simultaneously is critical. The time for a "step by step" approach is over. Hopefully, operations in North Waziristan are next on Pakistan’s hit list.

U.S. intelligence as well as the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI must review their watch lists. I suspect the watch lists are bloated and the analysts reviewing them are overstretched. If every Muhammad and Osama is on the list; if everyone who travels to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Syria is on the list; and if even members of mainstream Muslim organizations like the Islamic Society of North America, the Council on American and Islamic Relations, and the Universal Muslim Association of America are being closely watched, it is very difficult to pursue the real leads. Although this would be unpopular politically in the United States, culling the watch lists is the only way to isolate the significant chatter and stop terrorist attacks in America. 

Connecticut’s Muslim community maintains that Shahzad was not a regular visitor to any of the mosques or Islamic centers in the state. Still, in the future, American Muslims must be watchful and responsible and not import radical clerics, instead focusing on cultivating educated and broad-minded religious leaders from the United States. Imams who are raised and educated in the United States will be better equipped to communicate with future generations of Muslim Americans. 

Hassan Abbas is Quaid-i-Azam chair professor at Columbia University and Bernard Schwartz fellow at the Asia Society in New York, and the author of a recent New America Foundation research paper on the intersection of politics and militancy in Pakistan’s northwest.

More from Foreign Policy

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?

The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.
Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World

It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.
Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.

Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.
Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing

The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.