The Cable

The Cable goes inside the foreign policy machine, from Foggy Bottom to Turtle Bay, the White House to Embassy Row.

Failed Times Square bombing raises U.S.-Pakistan tensions

Watch CBS News Videos Online Secretary of State Hillary Clinton raised a few eyebrows last weekend when she said on CBS’s 60 Minutes that there would have been "very severe consequences" had Faisal Shahzad’s Nissan Pathfinder successfully exploded in New York’s Times Square, pointing to new information linking Pakistani groups to the failed attack. Clinton ...

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton raised a few eyebrows last weekend when she said on CBS’s 60 Minutes that there would have been "very severe consequences" had Faisal Shahzad’s Nissan Pathfinder successfully exploded in New York’s Times Square, pointing to new information linking Pakistani groups to the failed attack.

Clinton did say the United States has "gotten more cooperation" from Pakistan, citing a "sea change in the commitment we’ve seen from the Pakistani government." But, she stressed, "We expect more."

Her mention of "consequences" got wide play in Islamabad, where the remark was interpreted as a clear warning to Pakistan, which has long been accused of coddling terrorists to use in its decades-long proxy conflict with its arch-enemy, India. And it reportedly angered Pakistan’s powerful military, which saw a U.S. attempt to pressure it to crack down on jihadi groups on a timetable set in Washington.

U.S. officials have since spun or walked back Clinton’s comment, but the secretary’s remark was no gaffe. In private communications, the Obama administration is making it clear that the Times Square bombing attempt was a warning and that if Pakistan doesn’t speed up progress on several U.S. requests, the next Pakistan-linked terror attack will result in real consequences for the relationship.

"The U.S. is telling Pakistan: ‘You have a bigger problem, if one thing goes through, the momentum could shift and public opinion in the United States could demand more action,’" according to a high-level diplomatic source with direct knowledge of communications between the two governments.

Among the U.S. demands are allowing more U.S. personnel to participate on the ground in Pakistan, stopping the delays of visas for American officials, and removing obstacles to operations in Pakistan that originate in Pakistan. The U.S. side also wants Pakistan to give up any information it is holding back related to the Pakistani Taliban and other militant groups that pose an international or cross-border threat.

Pakistan has pledged to do all those things as part of a deal for increased military assistance that was hashed out during the recent U.S.-Pakistan strategic dialogue. But that deal is still being ironed out and "the American attitude toward Pakistan is, ‘We really need you to speed up things,’" our source said.

What’s the Pakistan’s government attitude? "We do it our way, not your way."

There’s also a concern in Pakistan that the Obama administration could take punitive measures in the wake of the Times Square incident, such as singling out travelers from Pakistan for heightened scrutiny or adding new visa restrictions.

"That’s not the best way to make friends. There should be some serious thinking about how not to overreact," said Shuja Nawaz, director of the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council.

After the Christmas Day underwear bomber incident, Pakistan was added to a list of 14 countries subject to more stringent screening procedures, causing a huge backlash in Pakistan and forcing the government to come out in public and decry the procedures.

So expect any tightening of security to happen very quietly, to avoid creating the impression that Americans view all Pakistanis as dangerous.

"If the security issue affects their ability to govern and provide services to their population, it will create even more problems," Nawaz said.

Perhaps reflecting the pushback from Pakistan, President Obama signaled patience Wednesday, saying, "I think what you’ve seen over the last several months is a growing recognition that they have a cancer in their midst."

"Part of what I’ve been encouraged by is Pakistan’s willingness to start asserting more control over some of these areas," he said, referring to the country’s militant-infested frontier areas like North Waziristan, where Shahzad is thought to have trained. "But it’s not going to happen overnight. And they have been taking enormous casualties; the Pakistani military has been going in fairly aggressively. But this will be an ongoing project."

Josh Rogin covers national security and foreign policy and writes the daily Web column The Cable. His column appears bi-weekly in the print edition of The Washington Post. He can be reached for comments or tips at josh.rogin@foreignpolicy.com.

Previously, Josh covered defense and foreign policy as a staff writer for Congressional Quarterly, writing extensively on Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, U.S.-Asia relations, defense budgeting and appropriations, and the defense lobbying and contracting industries. Prior to that, he covered military modernization, cyber warfare, space, and missile defense for Federal Computer Week Magazine. He has also served as Pentagon Staff Reporter for the Asahi Shimbun, Japan's leading daily newspaper, in its Washington, D.C., bureau, where he reported on U.S.-Japan relations, Chinese military modernization, the North Korean nuclear crisis, and more.

A graduate of George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, Josh lived in Yokohama, Japan, and studied at Tokyo's Sophia University. He speaks conversational Japanese and has reported from the region. He has also worked at the House International Relations Committee, the Embassy of Japan, and the Brookings Institution.

Josh's reporting has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, CBS, ABC, NPR, WTOP, and several other outlets. He was a 2008-2009 National Press Foundation's Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellow, 2009 military reporting fellow with the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism and the 2011 recipient of the InterAction Award for Excellence in International Reporting. He hails from Philadelphia and lives in Washington, D.C. Twitter: @joshrogin

More from Foreign Policy

Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.
Newspapers in Tehran feature on their front page news about the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, signed in Beijing the previous day, on March, 11 2023.

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America

The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.
Austin and Gallant stand at podiums side by side next to each others' national flags.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense

If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lays flowers at the Moscow Kremlin Wall in the Alexander Garden during an event marking Defender of the Fatherland Day in Moscow.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War

Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.
An Iranian man holds a newspaper reporting the China-brokered deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore ties, in Tehran on March 11.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests

And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.