Best Defense

Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

What happened at Wanat?

Sen. Webb issued this statement yesterday afternoon about the different takes of the Army and Central Command on the battle of Wanat: On July 9, 2009 I asked that the Department of Defense conduct an independent ‘re-investigation’ of the actions taken at Wanat at each level of command, rather than having the Army conduct an internal investigation. ...

Tom Brown/Getty Images
Tom Brown/Getty Images

Sen. Webb issued this statement yesterday afternoon about the different takes of the Army and Central Command on the battle of Wanat:

On July 9, 2009 I asked that the Department of Defense conduct an independent 're-investigation' of the actions taken at Wanat at each level of command, rather than having the Army conduct an internal investigation. The Department of Defense concurred with this request.   

CENTCOM conducted an intensive, three-month independent investigation which concluded that the company, battalion and brigade commanders were ‘derelict in the performance of their duties through neglect or culpable inefficiency.' General Petraeus approved this reinvestigation on January 21, 2010, and on June 23, the DOD Inspector General concurred with the findings as well.  As a result of these findings, the Army issued letters of reprimand to all three officers.   

Sen. Webb issued this statement yesterday afternoon about the different takes of the Army and Central Command on the battle of Wanat:

On July 9, 2009 I asked that the Department of Defense conduct an independent ‘re-investigation’ of the actions taken at Wanat at each level of command, rather than having the Army conduct an internal investigation. The Department of Defense concurred with this request.   

CENTCOM conducted an intensive, three-month independent investigation which concluded that the company, battalion and brigade commanders were ‘derelict in the performance of their duties through neglect or culpable inefficiency.’ General Petraeus approved this reinvestigation on January 21, 2010, and on June 23, the DOD Inspector General concurred with the findings as well.  As a result of these findings, the Army issued letters of reprimand to all three officers.   

However, the Army also conducted its own review of the independent investigation, resulting in the annulment of all three letters of reprimand. 

I find it deeply troubling that the Army has exonerated these officers and in the process rejected the findings of the independent review. This development raises concerns regarding the principle of command accountability in the Army."

Some time later, this statement arrived from the Army, and Webb’s ire became more understandable.

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1

More from Foreign Policy

Volker Perthes, U.N. special representative for Sudan, addresses the media in Khartoum, Sudan, on Jan. 10.

Sudan’s Future Hangs in the Balance

Demonstrators find themselves at odds with key U.N. and U.S. mediators.

In an aerial view, traffic creeps along Virginia Highway 1 after being diverted away from Interstate 95 after it was closed due to a winter storm.

Traffic Jams Are a Very American Disaster

The I-95 backup shows how easily highways can become traps.

Relatives and neighbors gather around a burned vehicle targeted and hit by an American drone strike in Kabul.

The Human Rights vs. National Security Dilemma Is a Fallacy

Advocacy organizations can’t protect human rights without challenging U.S. military support for tyrants and the corrupt influence of the defense industry and foreign governments.

un-sanctions-inspectors-china-foreign-policy-illustration

The Problem With Sanctions

From the White House to Turtle Bay, sanctions have never been more popular. But why are they so hard to make work?