The Cable

The Cable goes inside the foreign policy machine, from Foggy Bottom to Turtle Bay, the White House to Embassy Row.

Confusion about Afghanistan timeline remains

So, after President Obama’s new Afghanistan commander, Gen. David Petraeus, spent hours explaining the nuance of U.S. policy on Afghanistan to Congress, has the confusion about the July 2011 timeline been resolved? Not so much. Petraeus was extremely clear in describing Obama’s strategy to set July 2011 as the date that the U.S. will begin ...

So, after President Obama's new Afghanistan commander, Gen. David Petraeus, spent hours explaining the nuance of U.S. policy on Afghanistan to Congress, has the confusion about the July 2011 timeline been resolved? Not so much.

So, after President Obama’s new Afghanistan commander, Gen. David Petraeus, spent hours explaining the nuance of U.S. policy on Afghanistan to Congress, has the confusion about the July 2011 timeline been resolved? Not so much.

Petraeus was extremely clear in describing Obama’s strategy to set July 2011 as the date that the U.S. will begin to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, with the pace of that withdrawal dependent on the conditions on the ground. How many troops would leave and how fast is simply not determined yet, but "July 2011 is not a date when we will be rapidly withdrawing our forces and switching off the lights and closing the door behind us," he wrote in his written answer to questions from the committee.

After emerging from the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Petraeus’s nomination for his new post, chairman Carl Levin, D-MI, argued that the issue is settled and even those who don’t agree with the policy shouldn’t be able to continue to claim it’s unclear.

"Republicans may disagree with the policy but they can’t say now they are confused by it," Levin said. "Many people want to misrepresent the policy and then complain about it. Republicans can say they don’t like it, but that’s a different argument."

Levin also rejected the contention that the Afghan and Pakistani governments aren’t clear about what the July 2011 timeline means." I think they understand very clearly the date is a beginning point," he said.

Critics of Obama’s timeline, including Sen. John McCain, R-AZ, say it is a gift to the Taliban, citing numerous reports that the militants have been using the July 2011 date to convince wayward Afghans that the Americans are leaving — so you’d better side with the eventual winners now.

But Levin disagreed with that critique, saying the date — now just a year away — is needed to instill a sense of urgency within the Afghan security forces.

What if the Afghans simply can’t get ready that fast? "The president can change his mind," Levin said.

Not everyone’s persuaded.

"I’m as confused as ever," committee member Lindsey Graham, R-SC, told The Cable after the hearing.

Graham doesn’t believe administration officials when they say they have no idea what the pace of withdrawals will ultimately be, or whether the decision to draw down U.S. troops will take conditions on the ground into account, as Petraeus has emphasized in his public comments.

"General Petraeus is trying to be a loyal soldier, but I’m not buying that it is conditions based," Graham said.

 "If the policy is that the withdrawal will definitely begin in July 2011 and the only open question is the pace, that’s a damning policy," Graham added. "We need to resolve this. The enemy is being empowered by the confusion here at home."

Graham pointed to Vice President Joseph Biden‘s quote in a recent book by Newsweek reporter Jonathan Alter, when he said, "In July of 2011 you’re going to see a whole lot of people moving out. Bet on it."

Levin countered that no matter what the quote is, Biden is not the one making the decision.

"He had his input and that input was focused on training Afghan forces and not on increasing U.S. troops," Levin said. "He had his say and now the policy has been decided and he supports the policy."

This will probably come up when Petraeus hosts Biden for dinner tonight.

Josh Rogin covers national security and foreign policy and writes the daily Web column The Cable. His column appears bi-weekly in the print edition of The Washington Post. He can be reached for comments or tips at josh.rogin@foreignpolicy.com.

Previously, Josh covered defense and foreign policy as a staff writer for Congressional Quarterly, writing extensively on Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, U.S.-Asia relations, defense budgeting and appropriations, and the defense lobbying and contracting industries. Prior to that, he covered military modernization, cyber warfare, space, and missile defense for Federal Computer Week Magazine. He has also served as Pentagon Staff Reporter for the Asahi Shimbun, Japan's leading daily newspaper, in its Washington, D.C., bureau, where he reported on U.S.-Japan relations, Chinese military modernization, the North Korean nuclear crisis, and more.

A graduate of George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs, Josh lived in Yokohama, Japan, and studied at Tokyo's Sophia University. He speaks conversational Japanese and has reported from the region. He has also worked at the House International Relations Committee, the Embassy of Japan, and the Brookings Institution.

Josh's reporting has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, CBS, ABC, NPR, WTOP, and several other outlets. He was a 2008-2009 National Press Foundation's Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellow, 2009 military reporting fellow with the Knight Center for Specialized Journalism and the 2011 recipient of the InterAction Award for Excellence in International Reporting. He hails from Philadelphia and lives in Washington, D.C. Twitter: @joshrogin

More from Foreign Policy

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping give a toast during a reception following their talks at the Kremlin in Moscow on March 21.

Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?

The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.

Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.
Xi and Putin shake hands while carrying red folders.

Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World

It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.

Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.
Russian President Vladimir Putin greets Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.

It’s a New Great Game. Again.

Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.

Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.
Kurdish military officers take part in a graduation ceremony in Erbil, the capital of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, on Jan. 15.

Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing

The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.