Daniel W. Drezner

Keep on rockin’ in the free world

In light of former Fugee member Wyclef Jean’s campaign to become the president of Haiti, Stephanie Carvin asks some terrific questions:  I got to thinking – what other musical super stars could run as leaders to help fix the nations of the world? In what way could Lady Gaga help with nation-building projects? Could Paul McCartney ...

In light of former Fugee member Wyclef Jean’s campaign to become the president of Haiti, Stephanie Carvin asks some terrific questions

I got to thinking – what other musical super stars could run as leaders to help fix the nations of the world? In what way could Lady Gaga help with nation-building projects? Could Paul McCartney advise the World Bank in any way (other than being able to possibly fund a small third world nation by himself for a year)?

I’ll leave it to others to answer the latter two questions — but the first one is a real doozy.  Carvin offers some intriguing possibilities.  As someone who’s researched the link between celebrities and world politics, however, it’s worth pondering the question further. 

For me, the musicians I’d want in charge are the ones who demonstrated the ability to persist over time (which disqualifies Lady Gaga for now), the ability to fashion a coherent agenda (which disqualifies Bono), and the ability to avoid a shame spiral that embarrasses the country in question (which disqualifies Britney Spears and many, many others).  

So, which musician would I trust with, say, American hegemony?  Here are my top 5: 

5)  Flea, Red Hot Chili Peppers.  This band has stayed vital for close to two decades, and a crucial moment was Flea’s decision to re-recruit guitarist John Frusciante when the band’s fortunes were flagging.  The result was Californication and the Chili Peppers’ return to relevance.  Sounds like someone who could make good staffing decisions.  Downside:  could raise constitutional issues — Flea was born in Australia. 

4)  Dave Grohl, Foo Fighters.  After 1994, he could have gone through the rest of his life resting on his laurels as the drummer for the greatest American punk band in history. Instead, he became a frontman and formed the Foo Fighters.  And here just has to be a negotiating advantage from listening to this song before going into serious international negotiations.  Downside:  Grohl would need to get a serious grip on his coffee addiction

3)  Justin Timberlake.  The only member of ‘N Sync to thrive after the death of boy bands.  The only ex of Britney Spears to be known for something other than dating Britney Spears.  The only person I know who can be consistently funny on Saturday Night Live.  Clearly, he’s a survivor.  Downside:  Hmmm… sure, Timberlake is a survivor, but is he responsible for the demise of Britney and boy bands? 

2)  Snoop Dogg.  Anyone who needs his own translator is bound to confuse and obfuscate his adversaries.  Also, the man never seems rattled by anything — exactly the kind of cool head we need in the White House.  Downside:  there could be reasons beyond temperment that he’s so mellow. 

1) Madonna.  She’s been in vogue for decades now.  She’s been a true blue survivor, a ray of light to other female singers looking to break into the music industry.  If there’s anyone who knows how to properly game a situation, it’s her.  Downside:  There’s this. And this. This too.  Oh, don’t forget this.  Also, I’m not sure she thinks she’s an American anymore. 

Readers are warmly invited to proffer their own suggestions for musico-political royalty. 

In light of former Fugee member Wyclef Jean’s campaign to become the president of Haiti, Stephanie Carvin asks some terrific questions

I got to thinking – what other musical super stars could run as leaders to help fix the nations of the world? In what way could Lady Gaga help with nation-building projects? Could Paul McCartney advise the World Bank in any way (other than being able to possibly fund a small third world nation by himself for a year)?

I’ll leave it to others to answer the latter two questions — but the first one is a real doozy.  Carvin offers some intriguing possibilities.  As someone who’s researched the link between celebrities and world politics, however, it’s worth pondering the question further. 

For me, the musicians I’d want in charge are the ones who demonstrated the ability to persist over time (which disqualifies Lady Gaga for now), the ability to fashion a coherent agenda (which disqualifies Bono), and the ability to avoid a shame spiral that embarrasses the country in question (which disqualifies Britney Spears and many, many others).  

So, which musician would I trust with, say, American hegemony?  Here are my top 5: 

5)  Flea, Red Hot Chili Peppers.  This band has stayed vital for close to two decades, and a crucial moment was Flea’s decision to re-recruit guitarist John Frusciante when the band’s fortunes were flagging.  The result was Californication and the Chili Peppers’ return to relevance.  Sounds like someone who could make good staffing decisions.  Downside:  could raise constitutional issues — Flea was born in Australia. 

4)  Dave Grohl, Foo Fighters.  After 1994, he could have gone through the rest of his life resting on his laurels as the drummer for the greatest American punk band in history. Instead, he became a frontman and formed the Foo Fighters.  And here just has to be a negotiating advantage from listening to this song before going into serious international negotiations.  Downside:  Grohl would need to get a serious grip on his coffee addiction

3)  Justin Timberlake.  The only member of ‘N Sync to thrive after the death of boy bands.  The only ex of Britney Spears to be known for something other than dating Britney Spears.  The only person I know who can be consistently funny on Saturday Night Live.  Clearly, he’s a survivor.  Downside:  Hmmm… sure, Timberlake is a survivor, but is he responsible for the demise of Britney and boy bands? 

2)  Snoop Dogg.  Anyone who needs his own translator is bound to confuse and obfuscate his adversaries.  Also, the man never seems rattled by anything — exactly the kind of cool head we need in the White House.  Downside:  there could be reasons beyond temperment that he’s so mellow. 

1) Madonna.  She’s been in vogue for decades now.  She’s been a true blue survivor, a ray of light to other female singers looking to break into the music industry.  If there’s anyone who knows how to properly game a situation, it’s her.  Downside:  There’s this. And this. This too.  Oh, don’t forget this.  Also, I’m not sure she thinks she’s an American anymore. 

Readers are warmly invited to proffer their own suggestions for musico-political royalty. 

Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at Tufts University’s Fletcher School. He blogged regularly for Foreign Policy from 2009 to 2014. Twitter: @dandrezner

More from Foreign Policy

The Taliban delegation leaves the hotel after meeting with representatives of Russia, China, the United States, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Qatar in Moscow on March 19.

China and the Taliban Begin Their Romance

Beijing has its eyes set on using Afghanistan as a strategic corridor once U.S. troops are out of the way.

An Afghan security member pours gasoline over a pile of seized drugs and alcoholic drinks

The Taliban Are Breaking Bad

Meth is even more profitable than heroin—and is turbocharging the insurgency.

Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya addresses the U.N. Security Council from her office in Vilnius, Lithuania, on Sept. 4, 2020.

Belarus’s Unlikely New Leader

Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya didn’t set out to challenge a brutal dictatorship.

Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid

What the Taliban Takeover Means for India

Kabul’s swift collapse leaves New Delhi with significant security concerns.