Does Europe have a foreign policy yet?
I wrote earlier this month about the European Union’s bid to get full speaking rights at this year’s United Nations meetings. That effort failed: The EU hoped to get the new diplomatic season off to a flying start with a UN General Assembly resolution to secure it enhanced participation rights, from being one of a ...
I wrote earlier this month about the European Union's bid to get full speaking rights at this year's United Nations meetings. That effort failed:
I wrote earlier this month about the European Union’s bid to get full speaking rights at this year’s United Nations meetings. That effort failed:
The EU hoped to get the new diplomatic season off to a flying start with a UN General Assembly resolution to secure it enhanced participation rights, from being one of a mass of observers to one with virtually full rights to participate, speak and make proposals. The initiative failed when a counter-resolution to postpone a decision passed by 76 votes to 71. The 76 included most of the African, Caribbean and Pacific beneficiaries of EU aid. The objections seem mainly to have been on matters of diplomatic process rather than substance, so it may pass when put forward again.
On its own, whether the EU is treated as an observer at the U.N. or on par with member states is of little consequence to anyone but lawyers in Brussels and a smattering of law professors. But underlying the debate is the more significant issue of whether the EU is developing a coherent foreign policy. And on that perennial question, recent evidence is mixed at best. On the architectural front, the EU’s External Action Service — a corps of Euro-diplomats designed to give human faces to a common foreign policy — is lurching forward, although with plenty of sniping and bruised feelings about appointments and budgets.
Substantively, there are a few bright spots. When I was in Europe recently, several diplomats were trumpeting the EU’s success in getting Serbia to moderate its proposed General Assembly resolution on Kosovo and adopt a more constructive tone generally. Helpful no doubt, but hardly Camp David stuff. More broadly though, recent conversations have left me gloomy about the EU’s ability to spearhead the diplomatic effort necessary to stop Bosnia’s dangerous political backsliding.
Beyond Europe’s backyard, the picture is even muddier. I asked Sudan activist John Prendergast today about whether the EU was playing any meaningful role in the diplomatic efforts on Darfur or southern Sudan. The answer, in short, was no. As he describes it, several European diplomats are circulating around the edges of the talks but not exerting major influence and certainly not marshalling the full weight of the union. When activists talk about what might be the world’s most pressing humanitarian crisis, they will talk for hours about the nuances in the policies of Scott Gration, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, and of course the president himself. Catherine Ashton, Herman van Rompuy, and Jose Manuel Barrosso don’t merit a mention.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy
Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.
The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.
Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.
How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
