Why diplomats secretly love WikiLeaks

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other U.S. officials have condemned the WikiLeaks document dump — but judging by my email traffic, not all American officials are all that upset. Some, in fact, are delighted with the whole affair, for reasons ranging from professional pride in their handiwork to the opportunity to air longstanding grievances ...

FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other U.S. officials have condemned the WikiLeaks document dump -- but judging by my email traffic, not all American officials are all that upset. Some, in fact, are delighted with the whole affair, for reasons ranging from professional pride in their handiwork to the opportunity to air longstanding grievances over possibly wrongheaded public perceptions of foreign events.

I've had an email exchange with one official who believes that experts erroneously blame Washington for the tragic events surrounding Georgia's relationship with Russia, culminating in the two countries going to war in August 2008. Cables from U.S. embassies in Moscow and the Georgian capital of Tbilisi document rising American concern over tension between the two countries leading up to the war, and a belief that Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was intent on removing Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili from power. But they also detail how Saakashvili seemed intent on going to war over the flashpoint between Georgia and Russia -- which was to control the breakaway Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The documents show that American diplomats -- including John Tefft, the U.S. ambassador to Georgia -- repeatedly put excessive store in the word of Saakashvili, who lied at pivotal moments. But Tefft appears not to have caught on until it was too late. Whatever the case, the cables show one American official after another warning Saakashvili not to go to war, or face precisely the consequence that arrived afterward: permanent doubt in his leadership abroad.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other U.S. officials have condemned the WikiLeaks document dump — but judging by my email traffic, not all American officials are all that upset. Some, in fact, are delighted with the whole affair, for reasons ranging from professional pride in their handiwork to the opportunity to air longstanding grievances over possibly wrongheaded public perceptions of foreign events.

I’ve had an email exchange with one official who believes that experts erroneously blame Washington for the tragic events surrounding Georgia’s relationship with Russia, culminating in the two countries going to war in August 2008. Cables from U.S. embassies in Moscow and the Georgian capital of Tbilisi document rising American concern over tension between the two countries leading up to the war, and a belief that Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was intent on removing Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili from power. But they also detail how Saakashvili seemed intent on going to war over the flashpoint between Georgia and Russia — which was to control the breakaway Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The documents show that American diplomats — including John Tefft, the U.S. ambassador to Georgia — repeatedly put excessive store in the word of Saakashvili, who lied at pivotal moments. But Tefft appears not to have caught on until it was too late. Whatever the case, the cables show one American official after another warning Saakashvili not to go to war, or face precisely the consequence that arrived afterward: permanent doubt in his leadership abroad.

Diplomats labor under anonymity that some find unbearable; surely many of them dream of writing the next “Long Telegram.” So it is that another diplomat told me he can barely wait for WikiLeaks to get around to those he has written over the years. “The leaks save me the trouble of FOIAing my cables,” this diplomat told me by email. ” … I’m just anticipating with pleasure seeing some of my reporting.”

<p> Steve LeVine is a contributing editor at Foreign Policy, a Schwartz Fellow at the New America Foundation, and author of The Oil and the Glory. </p>

More from Foreign Policy

A Panzerhaubitze 2000 tank howitzer fires during a mission in Ukraine’s Donetsk region.
A Panzerhaubitze 2000 tank howitzer fires during a mission in Ukraine’s Donetsk region.

Lessons for the Next War

Twelve experts weigh in on how to prevent, deter, and—if necessary—fight the next conflict.

An illustration showing a torn Russian flag and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
An illustration showing a torn Russian flag and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

It’s High Time to Prepare for Russia’s Collapse

Not planning for the possibility of disintegration betrays a dangerous lack of imagination.

An unexploded tail section of a cluster bomb is seen in Ukraine.
An unexploded tail section of a cluster bomb is seen in Ukraine.

Turkey Is Sending Cold War-Era Cluster Bombs to Ukraine

The artillery-fired cluster munitions could be lethal to Russian troops—and Ukrainian civilians.

A joint session of Congress meets to count the Electoral College vote from the 2008 presidential election the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol  January 8, 2009 in Washington.
A joint session of Congress meets to count the Electoral College vote from the 2008 presidential election the House Chamber in the U.S. Capitol January 8, 2009 in Washington.

Congrats, You’re a Member of Congress. Now Listen Up.

Some brief foreign-policy advice for the newest members of the U.S. legislature.