Let the bodies through the door (II): Consultants are the biggest problem
Here is a guest column from someone who cannot be identified, responding to yesterday’s item about the growth in staffing at big joint commands: By Mr. Y Best Defense defense consultants correspondent The joke is, this chart doesn’t count contractors. I conservatively estimate that those numbers have increased by some 300 percent in 10 years. ...
Here is a guest column from someone who cannot be identified, responding to yesterday's item about the growth in staffing at big joint commands:
By Mr. Y
Best Defense defense consultants correspondent
The joke is, this chart doesn't count contractors. I conservatively estimate that those numbers have increased by some 300 percent in 10 years. Money is easier to get than government bodies (civilian or military). And, these people aren't really counted by FTEs [full-time equivalents] but simply by contract amount. Then, there are thousand more buried in sub-HQ agencies and "field activities" and every other permutation that lets them keep the staff off of "official" headquarters manning documents.
Here is a guest column from someone who cannot be identified, responding to yesterday’s item about the growth in staffing at big joint commands:
By Mr. Y
Best Defense defense consultants correspondentThe joke is, this chart doesn’t count contractors. I conservatively estimate that those numbers have increased by some 300 percent in 10 years. Money is easier to get than government bodies (civilian or military). And, these people aren’t really counted by FTEs [full-time equivalents] but simply by contract amount. Then, there are thousand more buried in sub-HQ agencies and "field activities" and every other permutation that lets them keep the staff off of "official" headquarters manning documents.
This growth creates sclerosis. It slows down decisions and action. It sucks the lifeblood out of eager 0-4s and 0-5 working at HQ, hoping to make a difference in policy (that they will then go implement when back in the field).
I am reading Michael Lewis’ book, The Big Short, about the subprime mortgage crisis that nearly brought capitalism to its knees. There were guys betting against the market in 2004-05-06 who couldn’t believe how stupid most of Wall Street was in making these subprime mortgage bets. As they got closer to the action and learned more — they realized it was even worse than they thought, and the people in leadership positions were even dumber than they could imagine.
That’s what we’re dealing with. The closer you get, the worse that it looks.
Secretary Gates is trying his damndest to get his arms around this, and shrink it. But the bureaucracy is resilient … and it is supported by a private sector power that is as pernicious as the weapons systems industry. It’s the consulting industry. Some outside perspectives are valuable and necessary. But, we have gone way beyond that. It’s just bodies — qualified or not — thrown into the system.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
