Why Tom was wrong not to take this Navy skipper’s screw-up more seriously
The other day I said I expressed some sympathy for the Navy captain, the skipper of the USS Enterprise, who made stupid videos. Since then I have been persuaded that the guy should have been fired, rather than reprimanded, because a top leader shouldn’t be doing frat-boy stuff. Now comes "Sam Kotlin," a veteran Navy ...
The other day I said I expressed some sympathy for the Navy captain, the skipper of the USS Enterprise, who made stupid videos. Since then I have been persuaded that the guy should have been fired, rather than reprimanded, because a top leader shouldn't be doing frat-boy stuff. Now comes "Sam Kotlin," a veteran Navy skipper, to explain why I should have taken it even more seriously than that. Reading this note over, I think he is right.
This is gonna rattle around awhile.
IMHO, the case against the Navy has four charges:
The other day I said I expressed some sympathy for the Navy captain, the skipper of the USS Enterprise, who made stupid videos. Since then I have been persuaded that the guy should have been fired, rather than reprimanded, because a top leader shouldn’t be doing frat-boy stuff. Now comes "Sam Kotlin," a veteran Navy skipper, to explain why I should have taken it even more seriously than that. Reading this note over, I think he is right.
This is gonna rattle around awhile.
IMHO, the case against the Navy has four charges:
1. The atrocious judgment and manifest egomania of XO Honors.
2. The failure of his boss and his boss’s boss to put a permanent end to the videos after the very first one was aired. ‘Didn’t know?’ BS. Supposed to know, couldn’t avoid knowing. By not judging this first evidence of impending doom to be unacceptable they made it acceptable.
3. The hopeless effort to contain the damage with that first disastrous press release last weekend, adding an air of cover-up to the Navy’s list of woe and another data point on Honors’ poor judgment.
4. Most seriously, the abusive and derisive tone of the videos towards other shipmates. An XO is supposed to protect his people. Honors ridiculed them and made it much easier for others to do likewise. For this alone I judge him guilty of conduct unbecoming, abuse of authority, and dereliction of duty.
Tom again: I accept the instruction gratefully and go forward hoping to do better next time.
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
