Armitage to represent in Kabul?
The British press (scroll down to it) is touting Richard Armitage as the next U.S. ambassador to Kabul: Excited chatter on the Ferrero Rocher circuit in Kabul includes a new possible name for the post of U.S. ambassador — one Richard Armitage. No wonder they’re in a tizz — the 65-year-old ‘Nam veteran was the ...
The British press (scroll down to it) is touting Richard Armitage as the next U.S. ambassador to Kabul:
Excited chatter on the Ferrero Rocher circuit in Kabul includes a new possible name for the post of U.S. ambassador -- one Richard Armitage. No wonder they're in a tizz -- the 65-year-old 'Nam veteran was the muscular number two at the state department during 9/11. He was said to have leaked the name of Valerie Plame in the Nigergate affair, and warned Pakistan that the US would bomb the country "back to the Stone Age" if it continued to back the Taliban. Our man in Kabul, Sir William Patey, has already proved a big hit; together, they could make quite a double act.
This actually makes sense if you think that the U.S. needs to deal pretty quickly and decisively with its two great problems in the region -- destructive Afghan governance by the Afghans and Pakistani complicity in Afghanistan's agony. I do.
The British press (scroll down to it) is touting Richard Armitage as the next U.S. ambassador to Kabul:
Excited chatter on the Ferrero Rocher circuit in Kabul includes a new possible name for the post of U.S. ambassador — one Richard Armitage. No wonder they’re in a tizz — the 65-year-old ‘Nam veteran was the muscular number two at the state department during 9/11. He was said to have leaked the name of Valerie Plame in the Nigergate affair, and warned Pakistan that the US would bomb the country "back to the Stone Age" if it continued to back the Taliban. Our man in Kabul, Sir William Patey, has already proved a big hit; together, they could make quite a double act.
This actually makes sense if you think that the U.S. needs to deal pretty quickly and decisively with its two great problems in the region — destructive Afghan governance by the Afghans and Pakistani complicity in Afghanistan’s agony. I do.
But I’d be surprised because the Plame stuff could make the confirmation hearings difficult. If he is confirmed, when Petraeus challenges him to a run, as is his wont, the weight-lifting Armitage can offer to bench-press Petraeus a few hundred times.
Armitage, by the way, is on the board of CNAS, where I hang my thinking hat. If you want his take on the future of South Asia, here’s a CNAS paper from last year in which he was a co-author.
(HT to TD)
More from Foreign Policy
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.
Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.
Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
