Peacekeeping, by the numbers
New York University’s Center on International Cooperation is out with its annual Review of Global Peace Operations. It’s a fantastic update on UN and non-UN peacekeeping operations around the world. It’s also full of good data on where peacekeepers operate, who they are, and who funds them. And on those questions, the report provides a ...
New York University's Center on International Cooperation is out with its annual Review of Global Peace Operations. It's a fantastic update on UN and non-UN peacekeeping operations around the world. It's also full of good data on where peacekeepers operate, who they are, and who funds them. And on those questions, the report provides a vivid reminder that UN peacekeeping is, for the most part, an activity done in Africa (almost 75 percent of UN military personnel are deployed there), by Africans and Asians (combined, more than 70 percent of peacekeepers come from these regions), and funded by the advanced industrialized countries (all told, these countries pay more than 80 percent of peackeeping costs). In a very real sense, the rich world has hired Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Indian, Egyptian, Nigerian and Nepalese troops to grapple with some of the world's most intractable conflicts.
New York University’s Center on International Cooperation is out with its annual Review of Global Peace Operations. It’s a fantastic update on UN and non-UN peacekeeping operations around the world. It’s also full of good data on where peacekeepers operate, who they are, and who funds them. And on those questions, the report provides a vivid reminder that UN peacekeeping is, for the most part, an activity done in Africa (almost 75 percent of UN military personnel are deployed there), by Africans and Asians (combined, more than 70 percent of peacekeepers come from these regions), and funded by the advanced industrialized countries (all told, these countries pay more than 80 percent of peackeeping costs). In a very real sense, the rich world has hired Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Indian, Egyptian, Nigerian and Nepalese troops to grapple with some of the world’s most intractable conflicts.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy
Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.
Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.
It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.
Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.
Sign up for World Brief
FP’s flagship evening newsletter guiding you through the most important world stories of the day. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
