International organizations as speed brakes
After a spate of news stories, the International Monetary Fund is denying again that it’s encouraging the Greek government to restructure its debt. Meanwhile, most analysts seem to assume that a restructuring is inevitable. My guess? A restructuring will happen, and by the time it does everyone will be as prepared as they can be ...
After a spate of news stories, the International Monetary Fund is denying again that it's encouraging the Greek government to restructure its debt. Meanwhile, most analysts seem to assume that a restructuring is inevitable. My guess? A restructuring will happen, and by the time it does everyone will be as prepared as they can be for it, economically, politically, psychologically and otherwise.
After a spate of news stories, the International Monetary Fund is denying again that it’s encouraging the Greek government to restructure its debt. Meanwhile, most analysts seem to assume that a restructuring is inevitable. My guess? A restructuring will happen, and by the time it does everyone will be as prepared as they can be for it, economically, politically, psychologically and otherwise.
One of the most important–but largely unappreciated–services international organizations provide is to slow the pace of events. These institutions are often criticized for their tendency to temporize, find stop-gap solutions, and kick problems down the road. In some cases, they should be criticized for this habit; many crises demand speed and decisiveness. But often a speed brake is just what is called for. In the peace and security realm, the U.N. Security Council often plays this role. Its long and frustrating deliberations can allow major players (notably the Council’s permanent members) to adjust to new situations, feel out their counterparts, and, in some cases, fend off domestic pressure for immediate action. The Council played this role during the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Middle East wars of 1967 and 1973 and still does today. In none of those cases did the Council formally resolve the underlying dispute, but in all of them the "speed brake" effect was important.
Similarly in the Greek case, the IMF and the EU probably won’t solve the underlying problem of Greek debt. But they may still be successful in mitigating the impact of an eventual Greek default and ensuring that it occurs in a more controlled manner than it would have otherwise. It’s not necessarily heroic stuff and the institutions probably won’t get much credit for it. But it’s the kind of service that helps keep crises from turning into cataclysms.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy
Can Russia Get Used to Being China’s Little Brother?
The power dynamic between Beijing and Moscow has switched dramatically.
Xi and Putin Have the Most Consequential Undeclared Alliance in the World
It’s become more important than Washington’s official alliances today.
It’s a New Great Game. Again.
Across Central Asia, Russia’s brand is tainted by Ukraine, China’s got challenges, and Washington senses another opening.
Iraqi Kurdistan’s House of Cards Is Collapsing
The region once seemed a bright spot in the disorder unleashed by U.S. regime change. Today, things look bleak.
Sign up for Morning Brief
Foreign Policy’s flagship daily newsletter with what’s coming up around the world today. Delivered weekdays.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
