Best Defense
Thomas E. Ricks' daily take on national security.

From Hanoi to Tripoli: An Army general on the genuine limits of aerial firepower

Ever notice how a passage from an old book can suddenly take on new meaning? On our rainy Saturday afternoon over the weekend I was checking something in Maj. Gen. (ret.) Robert Scales’ Firepower in Limited War (rev. ed), and this paragraph on p. 98 jumped out at me: A phenomenon of recent history has ...

ALBERTO PIZZOLI/AFP/Getty Images
ALBERTO PIZZOLI/AFP/Getty Images
ALBERTO PIZZOLI/AFP/Getty Images

Ever notice how a passage from an old book can suddenly take on new meaning? On our rainy Saturday afternoon over the weekend I was checking something in Maj. Gen. (ret.) Robert Scales' Firepower in Limited War (rev. ed), and this paragraph on p. 98 jumped out at me:

Ever notice how a passage from an old book can suddenly take on new meaning? On our rainy Saturday afternoon over the weekend I was checking something in Maj. Gen. (ret.) Robert Scales’ Firepower in Limited War (rev. ed), and this paragraph on p. 98 jumped out at me:

A phenomenon of recent history has been the disturbing habit among Western nations, the United States in particular, to expect too much from aerial firepower. Perhaps this expectation has been the product of our search for a technical means to win wars without expending lives. Whatever the cause, the use of airpower in Vietnam certainly followed the historical precedent. Policymakers with an imperfect understanding of the true limitations of modern airpower concluded all too readily that those wondrously destructive weapons of aerial warfare would be able to persuade the enemy to come to terms with a minimum of human investment.

Tom again: So, while I still think that President Obama had to intervene in Libya, yeah, I understand why this air campaign is making many of my friends very nervous.  

Meanwhile, I see where veteran intelligence analyst John McCreary is growing more pessimistic: "The survival of the Benghazi regime will be nothing short of miraculous, if events continue as they have this weekend." Suddenly a stalemate doesn’t look so bad.

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military from 1991 to 2008 for the Wall Street Journal and then the Washington Post. He can be reached at ricksblogcomment@gmail.com. Twitter: @tomricks1

More from Foreign Policy

Residents evacuated from Shebekino and other Russian towns near the border with Ukraine are seen in a temporary shelter in Belgorod, Russia, on June 2.
Residents evacuated from Shebekino and other Russian towns near the border with Ukraine are seen in a temporary shelter in Belgorod, Russia, on June 2.

Russians Are Unraveling Before Our Eyes

A wave of fresh humiliations has the Kremlin struggling to control the narrative.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva shake hands in Beijing.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva shake hands in Beijing.

A BRICS Currency Could Shake the Dollar’s Dominance

De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.

Keri Russell as Kate Wyler in an episode of The Diplomat
Keri Russell as Kate Wyler in an episode of The Diplomat

Is Netflix’s ‘The Diplomat’ Factual or Farcical?

A former U.S. ambassador, an Iran expert, a Libya expert, and a former U.K. Conservative Party advisor weigh in.

An illustration shows the faces of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin interrupted by wavy lines of a fragmented map of Europe and Asia.
An illustration shows the faces of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin interrupted by wavy lines of a fragmented map of Europe and Asia.

The Battle for Eurasia

China, Russia, and their autocratic friends are leading another epic clash over the world’s largest landmass.