Does the U.S. regret referring Libya to the ICC?
This BBC story quotes a Gaddafi advisor suggesting that the prospect of being tried by the International Criminal Court is a significant obstacle to stepping aside: The worse Col Gaddafi’s predicament, the more determined he may be not to give in. "What options does he have?" said a senior Gaddafi adviser I met in Tripoli ...
This BBC story quotes a Gaddafi advisor suggesting that the prospect of being tried by the International Criminal Court is a significant obstacle to stepping aside:
This BBC story quotes a Gaddafi advisor suggesting that the prospect of being tried by the International Criminal Court is a significant obstacle to stepping aside:
The worse Col Gaddafi’s predicament, the more determined he may be not to give in.
"What options does he have?" said a senior Gaddafi adviser I met in Tripoli earlier this month.
"Even if he did resign, then he gets arrested and taken to the Hague."
The adviser was referring to the impending decision by the International Criminal Court on whether to seek Col Gaddafi’s arrest on war crimes charges.
Attempts to find a negotiated solution to the conflict are already underway, including by a French businessman with wide contacts in Libya.
But any deal for Col Gaddafi to step aside would be even harder to achieve if these arrest warrants – also for his son, Saif, and his intelligence chief Abdullah Senussi – are approved.
As interesting, the article quotes a senior American official acknowledging that ICC involvement complicates a political exit. There is a mechanism for dealing with this kind of dilemma: Article 16 of the ICC’s Rome Statute allows the Security Council to defer an investigation for up to 12 months, with the possibility of renewal. In the past, the United States, in particular, has balked at suggestions that Article 16 be used in the context of investigations in Sudan, Kenya, and Uganda. Doing so in this case would effectively be an acknowledgement that referring the case was a mistake in the first place. I’d be very surprised if Britain, France or the United States could stomach such a reversal. But plenty about the Libya situation has been surprising.
David Bosco is a professor at Indiana University’s Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies. He is the author of The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World’s Oceans. Twitter: @multilateralist
More from Foreign Policy

Saudi-Iranian Détente Is a Wake-Up Call for America
The peace plan is a big deal—and it’s no accident that China brokered it.

The U.S.-Israel Relationship No Longer Makes Sense
If Israel and its supporters want the country to continue receiving U.S. largesse, they will need to come up with a new narrative.

Putin Is Trapped in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy of War
Moscow is grasping for meaning in a meaningless invasion.

How China’s Saudi-Iran Deal Can Serve U.S. Interests
And why there’s less to Beijing’s diplomatic breakthrough than meets the eye.