The Quotable Karzai: 5 statements that strained relations with the U.S.

As President Barack Obama prepares to announce the scale of the U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, one headache for Washington policy makers has been the increasingly incendiary and downright hostile statements coming from Afghan President Hamid Karzai. His latest attack came Saturday: You remember a few years ago I was saying thank you to the ...

AFP/Getty Images
AFP/Getty Images
AFP/Getty Images

As President Barack Obama prepares to announce the scale of the U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, one headache for Washington policy makers has been the increasingly incendiary and downright hostile statements coming from Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

His latest attack came Saturday:

You remember a few years ago I was saying thank you to the foreigners for their help; every minute we were thanking them. Now I have stopped saying that… They’re here for their own purposes, for their own goals, and they’re using our soil for that.

Even as Karzai’s rhetoric has turned sharply anti-Western and anti-American, it’s not clear he actually wants foreign troops to withdraw, a step that could endanger his government’s stability.

Still, his language has frustrated U.S. officials, who feel that he is undermining the war effort. “At the point your leaders believe that we are doing more harm than good, when we reach a point that we feel our soldiers and civilians are being asked to sacrifice without a just cause, and our generous aid programs dismissed as totally ineffective and the source of all corruption,” outgoing U.S. Ambassador to Kabul Karl Eichenberry said, in response to Karzai’s latest verbal barrage. “The American people will ask for our forces to come home.”

So what’s behind Karzai’s anger? A chorus of officials and analysts think he has simply become unhinged — U.S. intelligence reports have reportedly voiced the theory that he is “manic-depressive.”

But others believe that Karzai is calculating that anti-American statements will burnish his nationalist credentials and curry favor with the Afghan population.

“He doesn’t want to be seen as a lackey of the United States, he cultivates a sense of separateness,” said Vali Nasr, who served in the Obama administration on Afghanistan-Pakistan policy until this spring. “My read of him is he doesn’t trust our strategy and doesn’t believe we have a commitment to him.”

The contested 2009 presidential election, during which he was accused of vote fraud by many observers, represented a turning point in his relationship with the United States, Nasr said.

“In the past two years, he’s come to doubt our commitment and strategy,” he said. “And he sees what we demand of him as counter-productive to his political ambitions. So he lashes out.”

Still, Karzai is running the risk of undercutting support for the military intervention that is crucial for him to fend off the insurgency. Polls indicate that Americans are losing patience with the Afghan war. And when Afghanistan’s leader vociferously condemns American soldiers as occupiers, their impatience only grows.

“He’s systematically been creating the impression that we are wasting our time over there,” Nasr said.

Below, Foreign Policy compiled some of Karzai’s most notorious recent statements.

‘I might join the Taliban’

In perhaps his most infamous quote — made in April 2010 at a closed door meeting, and reported secondhand — Karzai threatened to quit the political reconciliation process and join the insurgency. The remark came in response to parliamentary refusal to back a proposal he favored, which he reportedly blamed on foreign conspiracy.

One parliamentarian in the room relayed the quote to the Associated Press:

He said that ‘if I come under foreign pressure, I might join the Taliban.

Some lawmakers said it showed Karzai was trying to pander to a hard-line, pro-Taliban block in parliament.

 

‘Afghans [know what to] do with occupiers’

At a news conference in May, Karzai issued a “last” warning to NATO that it must stop airstrikes responsible for the deaths of civilians:

If they continue their attacks on our houses, then their presence will change from a force that is fighting against terrorism to a force that is fighting against the people of Afghanistan. And in that case, history shows what Afghans do with trespassers and with occupiers.

American officials were irked by the implicit comparison to the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and by the fact that Karzai made little reference to the insurgent groups responsible for the vast majority of civilian deaths. According to United Nation figures, NATO forces were responsible for only about 16 percent of the 2,777 civilians who died due to conflict-related causes last year.

 

‘Stop these operations on our soil’

In March, during an “emotional speech” to relatives of civilians killed in the fighting, Karzai said NATO should stop its operations altogether in Afghanistan.

With great honor and with great respect, and humbly rather than with arrogance, I request that NATO and America should stop these operations on our soil. If the war is against terror, then this war is not here, terror is not here…our demand is that this war should be stopped.

Karzai later backed away somewhat from his “demand,” as a spokesman clarified that his comments only referred to NATO operations that killed civilians.

 

Get rid of the international reconstruction teams

Karzai called in February for the removal of provincial reconstruction teams (PRTs) – small groups staffed by civilians from the United States and other NATO countries — which manage large-scale aid and development projects around Afghanistan. Karzai’s gripe was that that the funds disbursed by the PRTs don’t flow through his government, according to the New York Times, a step U.S. and NATO officials are leary of taking due to widespread reports of corruption within his government.

We seriously and insistently want them to be removed. I hope the international community would deal with us from Afghanistan’s point of view, not from the point of view of their own national interest.

Robert Zeliger is News Editor of Foreign Policy.

More from Foreign Policy

An illustration shows the Statue of Liberty holding a torch with other hands alongside hers as she lifts the flame, also resembling laurel, into place on the edge of the United Nations laurel logo.
An illustration shows the Statue of Liberty holding a torch with other hands alongside hers as she lifts the flame, also resembling laurel, into place on the edge of the United Nations laurel logo.

A New Multilateralism

How the United States can rejuvenate the global institutions it created.

A view from the cockpit shows backlit control panels and two pilots inside a KC-130J aerial refueler en route from Williamtown to Darwin as the sun sets on the horizon.
A view from the cockpit shows backlit control panels and two pilots inside a KC-130J aerial refueler en route from Williamtown to Darwin as the sun sets on the horizon.

America Prepares for a Pacific War With China It Doesn’t Want

Embedded with U.S. forces in the Pacific, I saw the dilemmas of deterrence firsthand.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, seen in a suit and tie and in profile, walks outside the venue at the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. Behind him is a sculptural tree in a larger planter that appears to be leaning away from him.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, seen in a suit and tie and in profile, walks outside the venue at the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. Behind him is a sculptural tree in a larger planter that appears to be leaning away from him.

The Endless Frustration of Chinese Diplomacy

Beijing’s representatives are always scared they could be the next to vanish.

Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan welcomes Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman during an official ceremony at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, on June 22, 2022.
Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan welcomes Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman during an official ceremony at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, on June 22, 2022.

The End of America’s Middle East

The region’s four major countries have all forfeited Washington’s trust.