Charge of command
By Capt. John Byron, USN (Ret.) Best Defense office of nautical affairs Admiral Gary Roughhead, outgoing Chief of Naval Operations, last month issued a memorandum to current and prospective Navy commanding officers reminding them of their traditional and statutory duty in command. He implemented this with a directive that COs and PCOs meet with their ...
By Capt. John Byron, USN (Ret.)
Best Defense office of nautical affairs
Admiral Gary Roughhead, outgoing Chief of Naval Operations, last month issued a memorandum to current and prospective Navy commanding officers reminding them of their traditional and statutory duty in command. He implemented this with a directive that COs and PCOs meet with their ISIC (Immediate Superior In Command) to discuss the topic and leave behind a copy of the memo with their signature on it.
Some (I'm one) see this as an example of what Ernie King called "orders to follow orders," a pernicious practice that substitutes for more effective leadership. I also see frustration stemming from Roughhead's otherwise fine tour as CNO being tainted by the recent series of command screwups in the Fleet (which, BTW, he has no direct authority over).
By Capt. John Byron, USN (Ret.)
Best Defense office of nautical affairs
Admiral Gary Roughhead, outgoing Chief of Naval Operations, last month issued a memorandum to current and prospective Navy commanding officers reminding them of their traditional and statutory duty in command. He implemented this with a directive that COs and PCOs meet with their ISIC (Immediate Superior In Command) to discuss the topic and leave behind a copy of the memo with their signature on it.
Some (I’m one) see this as an example of what Ernie King called "orders to follow orders," a pernicious practice that substitutes for more effective leadership. I also see frustration stemming from Roughhead’s otherwise fine tour as CNO being tainted by the recent series of command screwups in the Fleet (which, BTW, he has no direct authority over).
Some serving officers think this aimed more at members of the flag-officer community as reminder of their duty to make things turn out right. And many welcome this as a useful comment on why command at sea is so distinct, seeing this a useful tool in training PCOs in the pipeline.
Useful? Silly? Redundant? Effective? Your thoughts?
More from Foreign Policy

Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.

So You Want to Buy an Ambassadorship
The United States is the only Western government that routinely rewards mega-donors with top diplomatic posts.

Can China Pull Off Its Charm Offensive?
Why Beijing’s foreign-policy reset will—or won’t—work out.

Turkey’s Problem Isn’t Sweden. It’s the United States.
Erdogan has focused on Stockholm’s stance toward Kurdish exile groups, but Ankara’s real demand is the end of U.S. support for Kurds in Syria.